Super_Ally 0 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 That's even more scary...... I dont disagree with that. I just take umbrage at people essentially questioning his professionalism. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DUDE 0 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I wouldn't see it as lack of professionalism, just his style chatting with everyone and joking about. No problem with that as far as I'm concerned 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 9, 2013 Share Posted January 9, 2013 I dont disagree with that. I just take umbrage at people essentially questioning his professionalism. If he thinks McCulloch as a lone centre forward is part of our best 11 then 60 minutes later he's making a substitution that moves players around so he can accommodate McCulloch at midfield then perhaps his professionalism should be questioned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super_Ally 0 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 If he thinks McCulloch as a lone centre forward is part of our best 11 then 60 minutes later he's making a substitution that moves players around so he can accommodate McCulloch at midfield then perhaps his professionalism should be questioned. I disagree. Yes his judgement can be questioned. It doesn't look like he;s making the right call. But I believe that is down to his view on the game, our squad and McCulloch's abilities relative to others who could play those roles, not being correct (as I view it) rather than because McCoist lacks a logical approach to the game in favour of an emotional one. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted January 10, 2013 Share Posted January 10, 2013 I disagree. Yes his judgement can be questioned. It doesn't look like he;s making the right call. But I believe that is down to his view on the game, our squad and McCulloch's abilities relative to others who could play those roles, not being correct (as I view it) rather than because McCoist lacks a logical approach to the game in favour of an emotional one. So he sees McCulloch is having an absolutely woeful game and knows he's carrying an injury (last week) so decides to replace him as striker but rather than hook him plays musical players and removes a midfielder having a half decent game in order solely to keep McCulloch on the pitch, if that's the case McCoist is watching a different game to the rest of us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gazza_8 233 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 He scored against Hamilton today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuznetsov 0 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 good on the lad. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,273 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 his injury record is horrendous but the few times I've seen him he'd looked a good player 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juancornetto 1 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 He's not good enough for us, not even taking into account our lowly position. I'd say he's carrying at least a stone of extra timber and his injury record is woeful. These two may well be linked. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 He's not good enough for us, not even taking into account our lowly position. I'd say he's carrying at least a stone of extra timber and his injury record is woeful. These two may well be linked. even accounting for the fact he scored at a higher level? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.