simplythebest 0 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 basically you have one crackpot website that doesn't like p murray because they prefer liquidation and whyte. here we have a yahoo capitalizing on that. Utter nonsense and you know it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,153 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 I am sure that McColl has a thick skin. Actions will count louder than words. I don't think any of us know how this will eventually play out but my guess (and it is a guess) is that there will be a negotiated solution. Agreed. Best thing McColl has done over the last week has been saying nothing. He will need to speak widely if this goes to an EGM though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 Utter nonsense and you know it. i will never forget the cheering of the success of miller newco bid in getting preferred bidder. let's not rewrite history here. people wanted whyte to own us not p murray. people wanted green to win not tbk. and their reasoning is feeble at best and utterly dishonest in the mostpart. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 i will never forget the cheering of the success of miller newco bid in getting preferred bidder. let's not rewrite history here. people wanted whyte to own us not p murray. people wanted green to win not tbk. and their reasoning is feeble at best and utterly dishonest in the mostpart. I just wanted whoever put the most cash up. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 really? i wanted nothing to do with a newco as a first option. thats like saying if dermot desmond wants rangers for a reserve team it's ok if he puts up the most money. but as i say some people just wanted anyone but p murray because he dared stand up to whyte. then green. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 really? i wanted nothing to do with a newco as a first option. thats like saying if dermot desmond wants rangers for a reserve team it's ok if he puts up the most money. but as i say some people just wanted anyone but p murray because he dared stand up to whyte. then green. Miller's plan involved a CVA albeit in a different kind of order. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonfly Trumpeter 50 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 All Paul Murray did when he was on the board was use his financial and business capabilities to reduce the debt to £15m, watch Rangers win titles even with the financial restraints, do all he could to prevent the club being shafted and tell David Murray in no uncertain terms how big a mistake he was making. Having seen the ridicule he was subjected to for attempting to keep DM liable for his actions then read the euphoria regarding Whyte then Green and the subsequent carnage, I am not surprised how some hate Paul Murray and want him crucified. It beggars belief. Then again, the Zeus mob are perhaps bluenoses with the best interests of Rangers FC at heart after all. Given that Whyte picked them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 it was a guaranteed newco. me i just wanted what was best for rangers. not the opposite of what ff wanted. that was very clearly not miller or green. nor whyte a year earlier. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 All Paul Murray did when he was on the board was use his financial and business capabilities to reduce the debt to £15m, watch Rangers win titles even with the financial restraints, do all he could to prevent the club being shafted and tell David Murray in no uncertain terms how big a mistake he was making. Having seen the ridicule he was subjected to for attempting to keep DM liable for his actions then read the euphoria regarding Whyte then Green and the subsequent carnage, I am not surprised how some hate Paul Murray and want him crucified. It beggars belief. Then again, the Zeus mob are perhaps bluenoses with the best interests of Rangers FC at heart after all. Given that Whyte picked them. exactly. this hatred of p murray would be all well and good if it hadn't twice led to the same people supporting disastrous regimes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 21, 2013 Share Posted August 21, 2013 All Paul Murray did when he was on the board was use his financial and business capabilities to reduce the debt to £15m, watch Rangers win titles even with the financial restraints, do all he could to prevent the club being shafted and tell David Murray in no uncertain terms how big a mistake he was making. Having seen the ridicule he was subjected to for attempting to keep DM liable for his actions then read the euphoria regarding Whyte then Green and the subsequent carnage, I am not surprised how some hate Paul Murray and want him crucified. It beggars belief. Then again, the Zeus mob are perhaps bluenoses with the best interests of Rangers FC at heart after all. Given that Whyte picked them. No matter how much the myth that Paul Murray reduced the debt is repeated it doesn't make it true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.