ranger_syntax 3,765 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 If you pay the licence fee then I think you should complain. I don't so I'll just leave it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Why should I have to do something like that ? The BBC should remember the trust people have in them. I guess if they sacked every journalist that offended every viewer there wouldn't be many left. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I guess if they sacked every journalist that offended every viewer there wouldn't be many left. what about just the ones telling blatant lies? lies that other bbc employees have been censured for by their own trust. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 I guess if they sacked every journalist that offended every viewer there wouldn't be many left. Why don't they report the facts ? Nothing to do with being offended. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 what about just the ones telling blatant lies? lies that other bbc employees have been censured for by their own trust. I think the issue there is separating lies from opinion. The other problem is that as with almost any organisation, whilst you may will have a complaint upheld; getting them to take action against the person concerned is extremely difficult if not impossible; or at least getting them to confirm that they have done so is impossible unless it becomes obvious i.e. the person concerned has been sacked. Companies will always hide behind confidentiality/ internal matter etc etc. I have just had a major complaint upheld by a bank against one of their employees and received £500 compensation but I cannot get them to say what action they have taken (if any) against the person concerned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 The BBC should remember the trust people have in them. They haven't done that for decades though and BBC Scotland are often just taking the piss. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,256 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 BBC Scotland is a largely unaccountable organisation who employ individuals such as Spence, Speirs, Cosgrove etc who do pretty much as they like. The only reason they get away with it is because of its guaranteed funding via the licence fee. Until this funding gets withdrawn and they need to produce accurate & factual broadcasts so that they rely on audience figures then the likes of Spence will continue to spout this type of anti-Rangers nonsense which he knows isn't true but knows he'll away with it. There is only one solution - SCRAP THE TV LICENCE FEE. SCRAP THE TV LICENCE FEE SCRAP THE TV LICENCE FEE SCRAP THE TV LICENCE FEE 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted September 4, 2013 Author Share Posted September 4, 2013 Bit of a campaigna being waged via Twitter, seems loads have complained. http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/complain-online/ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 4, 2013 Share Posted September 4, 2013 Complaint submitted. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted September 5, 2013 Share Posted September 5, 2013 Sackable offence surely. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.