Acemcl 0 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I thought Sevco588 had NO claim to the assets as D&P confirmed that all were sold directly to Sevco Scotland, bypassing 588 entirely? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chibmark 15 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 It was you that was pressing the whole Charles Green issue. No, that was you. I merely pointed out my disbelief that you still think he was forced out when it's blatantly obvious that he cashed in his chips. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 I thought Sevco588 had NO claim to the assets as D&P confirmed that all were sold directly to Sevco Scotland, bypassing 588 entirely? The had the sole irrefutable right to purchase the assets, they could not have legally been sold to Sevco Scotland Ltd without the acquiescence of Sevco 5088 Ltd. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calgacus 8 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 Some of the charlotte fakes stuff showed that the contract had been novated to Sevco Scotland, which means that Sevco 588 or someone on it's behalf agreed to the transfer of the right to purchase to Sevco Scotland. The signature of one director is enough for a document to be legally binding. The alternative is that Sevco 5088 didn't agree and D& P went ahead and sold to Sevco Scotland without 5088's agreement. 5088 would then have remedies against D& P for breach of contract. You would have thought that if they hadn't agreed to the transfer of the contact they would have tried to exercise those remedies as soon the sale to Sevco Scotland was announced. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 13, 2013 Share Posted October 13, 2013 apparently all the directors of sevco 5088 agreed to it verbaly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 There's a thread running on FF now saying Bain is to come back in the interim as Stockdale is resigning? Tippex out again...." Get the Spivs back" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,199 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 There's a thread running on FF now saying Bain is to come back in the interim as Stockdale is resigning? Tippex out again...." Get the Spivs back" Didnt realise Martin Bain was an accountant 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Didnt realise Martin Bain was an accountant As interim CEO, the Stockdale rumour was part of the thread, my mistake with the link. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 As interim CEO, the Stockdale rumour was part of the thread, my mistake with the link. Aye that Stockdale is a bad man, a very bad man!..... 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 Aye that Stockdale is a bad man, a very bad man!..... Spiv is far as i'm prepared to go. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.