ian1964 10,431 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Lifted from FF: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Sorry if this is terribly obvious, but - what does this mean? Earley and Whyte "terminated" (oh what a lovely string of four words) and then appointed three and four days later - to what end?? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy steel 0 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 At a total guess, it's probably so they can say to some other poor dupes 'look at all our companies' and bamboozle them with a trail the length of Oregon should they try to research it themselves. How they are not in jail in beyond me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,351 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 So who was the director that appointed Aiden Earley on 3/2/14? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,277 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 NOTE ... nothing appears on the company check website. I would assume that the Company House website starts with a www too. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,351 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 NOTE ... nothing appears on the company check website. I would assume that the Company House website starts with a www too. The company check website is an irrelevance. It is not totally accurate. The Companies House website is the definitive one. Director changes are submitted to Companies House. Company check will just take their information from the Companies House website. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,179 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 So who was the director that appointed Aiden Earley on 3/2/14? Isn't that just bad wording, i.e. Director appointed - Aiden Early? Same language is used for appointment of Whyte. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,351 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Isn't that just bad wording, i.e. Director appointed - Aiden Early? Same language is used for appointment of Whyte. You are misunderstanding the question. There has to be a director who authorises a director's appointment and I was asking who it was in the case of Earley. Who signed the form (if it was done off-line)? Was there an existing dirctor? I could check it out myself but don't have the time or inclination. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,277 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 The company check website is an irrelevance. It is not totally accurate. The Companies House website is the definitive one. Director changes are submitted to Companies House. Company check will just take their information from the Companies House website. I was pointing at the rather dubious "wck2" instead of "www" of the linked document above. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 6, 2014 Share Posted February 6, 2014 Green of course 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.