der Berliner 3,246 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Sidenote, what would the so-called SPIVS actually gain from another admin event? Serious answers please. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Sidenote, what would the so-called SPIVS actually gain from another admin event? Serious answers please. 100 percent of the shares and assets. Same as last time 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 100 percent of the shares and assets. Same as last time ... And none of the season ticket revenue? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 ... And none of the season ticket revenue? I would hope not but will people really boycott? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Also the free or cheep shedding of staff and players. Get out of contracts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 Also the free or cheep shedding of staff and players. Get out of contracts. If it was 2 years ago maybe I would see the sense , but surely not when we are so close to the top league and then Europe , if they mess this up for next year things could go totally pear shaped 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 I don't see it myself far more likely they will just give us a loan and rape us on the terms. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluebear54 0 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 It's not us they're raping. It's the Company. We merely fund it. And yes, I think there would be a big backlash if there were to be another administration. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,246 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 100 percent of the shares and assets. Same as last time What? Maybe you got me wrong: those who own the club right now ... what would they gain if they let it slip into another admin event? AFAIK, they are sure lose part of their investment, whereas assets et al it would all go under the stewardship of the administrators. And that might be the point where King finally steps in and snaps the club up in full, whereas the "SPIVS" that some see as running the club get their pence per pound stuff? If that's the scenario, why wouldn't they do all they can to prevent another admin event? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 18, 2014 Share Posted February 18, 2014 It's not us they're raping. It's the Company. We merely fund it. And yes, I think there would be a big backlash if there were to be another administration. You see I think it is us. I see rangers as a family. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.