rbr 1,247 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 there's no option to get it back is the difference. ahh right so you dont lose anything then , dont see why you should get your money back as your buying shares , you still have your shares . Its been made out as if you get nothing 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plgsarmy 111 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 ahh right so you dont lose anything then , dont see why you should get your money back as your buying shares , you still have your shares . Its been made out as if you get nothing I think the shares are bought as a collective B, so you wouldn't get them back as far as I know but I'm not certain whether there will be a mechanism for any kind of refund. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 I think the shares are bought as a collective B, so you wouldn't get them back as far as I know but I'm not certain whether there will be a mechanism for any kind of refund. is that also the case with buyrangers? the shares are collectively owned. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbr 1,247 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 I think the shares are bought as a collective B, so you wouldn't get them back as far as I know but I'm not certain whether there will be a mechanism for any kind of refund. There is no way that if you join this scheme and after a period of time you leave it you get nothing , that would be illegal , you have purchased something through a regulated scheme 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
plgsarmy 111 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 There is no way that if you join this scheme and after a period of time you leave it you get nothing , that would be illegal , you have purchased something through a regulated scheme You may be right but the word donation was used a couple of times. Perhaps someone could clarify. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTinMan99 0 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 Why can't the respective committees meet for a pint and just decide on one scheme with a clear aim? They all say they want what's best for the club, but everyone thinking up their own plan is only dividing the amount of spare cash that our support may have. There's no need for the confusion that 2 different schemes is creating. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 The way I see it is this. BuyRangers is about fan ownership. Rangersfirst is about fan ownership lite. So it's BuyRangers for me. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 Why can't the respective committees meet for a pint and just decide on one scheme with a clear aim? They all say they want what's best for the club, but everyone thinking up their own plan is only dividing the amount of spare cash that our support may have. There's no need for the confusion that 2 different schemes is creating. I think most people would broadly agree with that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 Why can't the respective committees meet for a pint and just decide on one scheme with a clear aim? They all say they want what's best for the club, but everyone thinking up their own plan is only dividing the amount of spare cash that our support may have. There's no need for the confusion that 2 different schemes is creating. I look forward to them uniting under the banner of "Amalgamated Rangers Shareholding Entities". 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 22, 2014 Share Posted February 22, 2014 I look forward to them uniting under the banner of "Amalgamated Rangers Shareholding Entities". rangers shareholding amalgamated entities. splitters. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.