Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

assuming the investment is from dave king it would be fair to say that he would want to run the show.

 

If it is true that investment has been offered and has been refused, it brings the intentions of the board into question. what ever they are up to it isnt for the benefit of the club. They will reach their goals by any means. we could end up with a carcass by the time they are finished.

Link to post
Share on other sites

assuming the investment is from dave king it would be fair to say that he would want to run the show.

 

If it is true that investment has been offered and has been refused, it brings the intentions of the board into question. what ever they are up to it isnt for the benefit of the club. They will reach their goals by any means. we could end up with a carcass by the time they are finished.

 

Does DK genuinely have the money his merry band of supporters would like you to believe he has?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does DK genuinely have the money his merry band of supporters would like you to believe he has?

 

You say this shortly after saying to someone on the other thread "Spare me the DK nonsense" ??

 

How about you spare everyone your own Dave King nonsense?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does DK genuinely have the money his merry band of supporters would like you to believe he has?

 

You have been given ample opportunity to provide proof to refute their claims and to back up your assertion, which you state quite frequently, that he has no money. On every single occasion you haven't been forthcoming.

 

Could this be the one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe you, SC, but you must realise that when people succeed in their lives to this extent, the change that would come from buying Rangers is huge and potentially very disruptive.

 

Yes, people can be appointed to pull strings, but the profile that goes with being Rangers kingpin can compromise other business areas and intrude into personal life.

 

David Murray loved it, but would he do it in 2014 if he could be that younger man again? Rangers was a great acquisition when he bought it, but it's not a great acquisition any more.

 

Today's thrusting young Scottish entrepreneurs will not be drawn to Rangers as readily as David Murray was, which is a shame, but it's a sign of the times.

 

It's not just fame that goes with the Rangers gig, it's infamy too, and many don't need the hassle - or the large and inevitably expanding hole in their bank balance.

 

This scenario has been created by our own supporter groups as can be seen in the statement blasting Mike Ashley and all the way back to "yanks go home".

Link to post
Share on other sites

This scenario has been created by our own supporter groups as can be seen in the statement blasting Mike Ashley and all the way back to "yanks go home".

 

Supporters and how they interact, fund and have been generally ready to consume mislead spin and lies have certainly had a lot to do with why we are where we are. In short, we have been exploited.

 

The "scenario" as you call it has been set-up by SDM and subsequently exploited by more blatant sp.ivs.

 

To try and lay the blame and only talk of supporters is as unbalanced as a Real Madrid v Forfar cup-tie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.