jhunter 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 He wouldn't be throwing his money down a black hole. He'd be acquiring a significant shareholding(which wouldn't cost him a lot at the moment)which would allow him influence in the way Rangers are run. why won't he do that? Are you paying the slightest bit of attention as to what is pouring out of Ibrox right now regarding the signing away of our income streams? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,255 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Are you paying the slightest bit of attention as to what is pouring out of Ibrox right now regarding the signing away of our income streams? Are you paying the slightest bit of attention to what I wrote ? If King bought a shareholding then he'd get influence and be able to begin to put an end to this sort of thing.It wouldn't happen overnight though butif King is as wealthy as his supporters make out what's stopping him? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Are you paying the slightest bit of attention to what I wrote ? If King bought a shareholding then he'd get influence and be able to begin to put an end to this sort of thing.It wouldn't happen overnight though butif King is as wealthy as his supporters make out what's stopping him? They won't sell a controlling interest and even if they did they have the club hamstrung with "onerous contracts". He won't be able to run the club properly. And forget about it being Dave King - that is true if ANYONE wanted to buy it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Can someone point out these "onerous contracts", preferrably in the accounts or the like? Who are the beneficiaries? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,410 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 John DC Gow @JohnDCGow · 1h Dave King told fans not to renew then disappeared. All of these rich guys could get together, but they want Rangers for themselves. Replied to 0 times John DC Gow @JohnDCGow · 1h Only a consortium or single person buying out those with shares and injecting capital will save Rangers now. Anything else is fantasy. Replied to 0 times John DC Gow @JohnDCGow · 1h Fans buying shares is great, but it will not save the club. Supporters need to face reality that this is as bad, or worse, than 2012. https://twitter.com/JohnDCGow 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,255 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 They won't sell a controlling interest and even if they did they have the club hamstrung with "onerous contracts". He won't be able to run the club properly. And forget about it being Dave King - that is true if ANYONE wanted to buy it. At the last AGM the reqs got 30 percent of the vote. I was amazed at how high they got. Why couldn't King(or someone) have acquired 20 percent shareholding? They'd certainly be able to influence the club then would they not? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,255 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Can someone point out these "onerous contracts", preferrably in the accounts or the like? Who are the beneficiaries? I'd like to see the details of these 'onerous contracts' which keep getting referred to 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Can someone point out these "onerous contracts", preferrably in the accounts or the like? Who are the beneficiaries? I'd like to see the details of these 'onerous contracts' which keep getting referred to Well the retail is gone to ashley as are the naming right to the stadium there is now this story on .thecoplandroad.org http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2014/09/what-was-mike-ashleys-preferred-pr-firm.html but you just go on believing that those running Rangers are "doing their best" 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,255 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 Well the retail is gone to ashley as are the naming right to the stadium there is now this story on .thecoplandroad.org http://www.thecoplandroad.org/2014/09/what-was-mike-ashleys-preferred-pr-firm.html but you just go on believing that those running Rangers are "doing their best" The idea that Ibrox would get renamed the Sports Direct Arena(or something similar) and Rangers would get nothing is ridiculous. Also do you know the terms of the retail contract to Sports Direct? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted September 5, 2014 Share Posted September 5, 2014 but you just go on believing that those running Rangers are "doing their best" Neither me or Rab said anything to that line of thought. Quite bizarre a thing to say if people looking for answers ... BTW, while it makes good noises, this 1 pound stuff, I actually believe that Ashley pays quite a bit more than that cometh the time. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.