RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 You would have to think that if they are found guilty and convicted then all contracts would be null & void?,I'm only guessing!. That's what I'm starting to think 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 So only £4m a year? We've had turnover of £12m a year in the past (excluding the years when we made our own strips) so the boycott is definitely having an impact. Yeah, we used to make about 5m *profit* for the club, never mind the other business partners. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 You would have to think that if they are found guilty and convicted then all contracts would be null & void?,I'm only guessing!. The directors that are being taken to court were not the ones who agreed the current retail deal, so I doubt it will have any immediate effect. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruno55 0 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Will still have a few supporters among the Bears including on here no doubt! Who still supports Ashley on here forlan? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 The directors that are being taken to court were not the ones who agreed the current retail deal, so I doubt it will have any immediate effect. Perhaps no immediate impact but if Green & Co are convicted couldn't that open a whole can of worms regards contracts that they negotiated ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted November 3, 2015 Author Share Posted November 3, 2015 So only £4m a year? We've had turnover of £12m a year in the past (excluding the years when we made our own strips) so the boycott is definitely having an impact. Not really, SD did not have the contract before. Ashley will see this as £4M he did not have previously. Why the fans groups have not organised a demo at the club superstore I cannot fathom. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,237 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 (edited) Who still supports Ashley on here forlan? No-one really supported him (nor does now), but some saw reason why it was, at the time, good to have his "backing". For if anything he would protect his investment (not Rangers) and would most likely have prevented us from nearly going bust. Which looked rather likely at the start of last season. Ashley obviously turned out to be the capitalist hardliner that he is and sure did not take well that his cabal was ousted. I wouldn't be surprised if he rolls any rock that is available to him in our way from now on. BTW, a repayment of the 5m to SD would return quite a bit of marketing rights etc. to the club. King is playing that card hard, so these two are at a stand-off now. As long as King knows what he is doing and it won't come back to haunt us, fair enough. We ... have little insight in this though, hence you will get some wary glances and comments. Edited November 3, 2015 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Not really, SD did not have the contract before. Ashley will see this as £4M he did not have previously. What I meant was that it was having an impact on sales. I wasn't trying to imply that it would get Ashley round the table. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Perhaps no immediate impact but if Green & Co are convicted couldn't that open a whole can of worms regards contracts that they negotiated ? Possibly, but probably not the current SD deal. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Possibly, but probably not the current SD deal. Why not ? If it transpired SD/MASH were signing contracts with individuals who'd fraudulently acquired a business. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.