SteveC 150 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Surely somewhere in company law the directors who signed up for this are accountable. You'd think so. Could it be part of the ongoing court action? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Surely somewhere in company law the directors who signed up for this are accountable. One wonders what the SD non-exec directors think of the way things in general are going at SD. Do they have any? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Scandal of a deal and we should be looking for recompense from whoever agreed it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacK1950 2,231 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Probably any non-exec are all related to Fatman and are incapable of thought. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Scandal of a deal and we should be looking for recompense from whoever agreed it. We need shot off the PUMA shirt deal too. It'll be worth peanuts 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc 280 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Scandal of a deal and we should be looking for recompense from whoever agreed it. Do we know which of the shady ****s that were in charge of our club at the time signed this deal off? Now that its terms are public knowledge any fool can see it was a stitch-up for the benefit of Ashley and him alone. No director who had any serious care for the company they were in charge of would have agreed to such a one-sided deal. It's not simply unreasonable, it's taking the fucking piss. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 If fraud convictions are successful I would guess the current board will want to revisit all contracts signed by those individuals during their time at Rangers 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 If fraud convictions are successful I would guess the current board will want to revisit all contracts signed by those individuals during their time at Rangers King said as much against Ashley, that he would be held to account financially for the losses tp the club on the merchandise contracts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 One wonders what the SD non-exec directors think of the way things in general are going at SD. Do they have any? Ashleys got the majority of shares. There's nothing anyone can do 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,263 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Ashleys got the majority of shares. There's nothing anyone can do That maybe so but the value of those shares will continue to fall if things keep going as they are. Even MA won't want that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.