RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Replacing Marvin Andrews with Karl Svensson was PLG's worst decision 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Given how rangers did after him and how he did it's easy to conclude that boyd and ferguson were right not let guen. It won't be quite as simple as that but le guen made huge mistakes. One probably was not dropping ferguson and boyd. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Given how rangers did after him and how he did it's easy to conclude that boyd and ferguson were right not let guen. It won't be quite as simple as that but le guen made huge mistakes. One probably was not dropping ferguson and boyd. Boyd and Ferguson were totally wrong imo mate. They were supposed to be athletes but failed to follow a training programme introduced by a new manager. They did that due to their own sloth and had nothing to do with how the team was playing. Both undermined the manager and would/should have been turfed out if our owner had balls. That Le Guen made mistakes in signings or tactics doesn't really come into it. His record was there to be judged and acted upon on its own. We got rid of him due to his own naivety and incompetence . That one player came to be known as Barry Sideways and the other was a serial lazy bastard shows their own merits. Summing up, Ferguson and Boyd weren't acting to save Rangers. They were looking to draw great wages for doing anything but what they were being told to do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
boabie 230 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Given how rangers did after him and how he did it's easy to conclude that boyd and ferguson were right not let guen. It won't be quite as simple as that but le guen made huge mistakes. One probably was not dropping ferguson and boyd. Boyd and Ferguson were totally wrong imo mate. They were supposed to be athletes but failed to follow a training programme introduced by a new manager. They did that due to their own sloth and had nothing to do with how the team was playing. Both undermined the manager and would/should have been turfed out if our owner had balls. That Le Guen made mistakes in signings or tactics doesn't really come into it. His record was there to be judged and acted upon on its own. We got rid of him due to his own naivety and incompetence . That one player came to be known as Barry Sideways and the other was a serial lazy bastard shows their own merits. Summing up, Ferguson and Boyd weren't acting to save Rangers. They were looking to draw great wages for doing anything but what they were being told to do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Given how rangers did after him and how he did it's easy to conclude that boyd and ferguson were right not let guen. It won't be quite as simple as that but le guen made huge mistakes. One probably was not dropping ferguson and boyd. The statement from Boyd today does not say they were correct he is in fact saying they should have given his methods a chance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,195 Posted November 13, 2016 Share Posted November 13, 2016 Sebo at least tried his arse off for the team. Ferguson just tried to make an arse of the team. Technically a far worse player yes, definitely. One central cog not giving a fuck makes him a bigger diddy in my eyes. I think you are guilty of revisionism. If you wish to suggest that Ferguson cost PLG the dressing room that is fine.... however, I think it is an incredible stretch, and certainly not my recollection, to suggest that Ferguson "couldn't give a fuck". In fact, I would say the opposite were true. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 I think you are guilty of revisionism. If you wish to suggest that Ferguson cost PLG the dressing room that is fine.... however, I think it is an incredible stretch, and certainly not my recollection, to suggest that Ferguson "couldn't give a fuck". In fact, I would say the opposite were true. It is your meaning but again Boyd has confirmed that the players were not open to new training methods. If you do your best to undermine a manager by not performing and causing unrest in the dressing room doesn't sound like you really care to me. You are entitled to your own opinion though. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 The statement from Boyd today does not say they were correct he is in fact saying they should have given his methods a chance. Of course they should have but that doesn't mean they were wrong about them. Or more so him. It all worked out for the best for rangers even if the method was a bit wrong. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BalooBear 7 Posted November 14, 2016 Share Posted November 14, 2016 Only one good thing PLG done was bring big Sasa Papac he was a manager with a false reputation that we all bought into including Murray Lyon had the best academy at the time that was churning out stars at the rate of knots. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.