pete 2,499 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Too much of dream that one. I thought it might be. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 Too much of dream that one. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 He was paid. Thats why he does everything That is a certainty but then again we all do everything for the pay. The difference is most do it honestly. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 8, 2017 Share Posted February 8, 2017 That is a certainty but then again we all do everything for the pay. The difference is most do it honestly. And legally. Allegedly 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Duff and Phelps claimed sevco 5088 made the best offer so all other bids were discounted but they didn't sell to sevco 5088. They sold to sevco scotland a different company 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Duff and Phelps claimed sevco 5088 made the best offer so all other bids were discountedbut they didn't sell to sevco 5088. They sold to sevco scotland a different company They never opened the sale up again when the cva failed. Indeed they definitely had a higher bid for the assets they refused. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,266 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Could it be BDO think D&P sold off the assets far too cheaply hence this legal action against them ? £5.5m was it ? Always did seem ultra cheap to me. Wouldn't have bought half of Auchenhowie with that 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,444 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Despite them having a binding irrevocable deal (or so we were told) to sell to Sevco 5088 too. In the lexicon of sharp practice, "binding" means the cover, and "irrevocable" refers to a trick won by playing a Trump rather than following suit. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uilleam 5,444 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 Menzies Corporate Restructuring (MCR). Was it a stroke of luck or misfortune that they employed David Grier who just happened to sign the floating charge over RFC plc's assets on behalf of the then Bank of Scotland? It would mean, perhaps, that MCR had had a window into the nebulous world of Murray's Rangers' finances. As my horseracing friends attest, all insight is helpful, if not today, then tomorrow. In this case, perhaps, particularly useful, when you are consultants of choice to assorted hyenas, jackals, and carrion crows. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian1964 10,427 Posted February 9, 2017 Share Posted February 9, 2017 This is what Murray will be remembered for!, he is the cause of the whole demise of our club!, rat of a man! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.