Jump to content

 

 

Banking facility


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, forlanssister said:

Failing to get all the excitement this is generating.

 

I don't view this as a positive step at all.

So long as they aren't using the credit/banking facility to run up debt and are still balancing the books, so to speak, then it allows them to operate in times of reduced cashflows.

 

Should only be used as a buffer, not a regular part of working capital, IMHO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, craig said:

So long as they aren't using the credit/banking facility to run up debt and are still balancing the books, so to speak, then it allows them to operate in times of reduced cashflows.

 

To me it looks like a substitution for the undertaking given by the Chairman to Campbell Dallas.

 

1 minute ago, craig said:

Should only be used as a buffer, not a regular part of working capital, IMHO.

 Absolutely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, forlanssister said:

I don't think it does either of those things at all.

You probably have more idea of these financial things than I do. Suggestions on the dark side are that Close are 1 star rated ie an expensive option and that any loan will be secured on property.

The "cold shoulder" thing and Close giving us facilities has caused some consternation over there as that was their latest big thing to see us go under. 

Which is nice.                         :wanker:

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, boabie said:

You probably have more idea of these financial things than I do. Suggestions on the dark side are that Close are 1 star rated ie an expensive option and that any loan will be secured on property.

The "cold shoulder" thing and Close giving us facilities has caused some consternation over there as that was their latest big thing to see us go under. 

Which is nice.                         :wanker:

I'n not worried in regards to the longer term.

 

My understanding is that the Albion car park and Edmiston House have been used as security.

 

This is not an "overdraft" and I doubt it's a cheap form of short term finance but our options are extremely limited and it may well have been the least worst option if that makes sense.

 

I won't be losing any sleep over it but it's certainly no cause for any celebration irrespective of how you see it spun.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A deal with Close Brothers suggests there is a bigger deal in the pipeline.  This is not their normal business so I'm intrigued.  If this was a simple facility we needed, why not just ask a high street lender?  We have sufficient turnover and assets to secure significant borrowing, or even an overdraft facility.  Close is only interested in this if there is something bigger in the near future, and there's only a win in this for us if that's the case too, otherwise Close is an expensive option.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.