Jump to content

 

 

Silly Lafferty


Recommended Posts

On 21/10/2018 at 05:22, Bluedell said:

Sounds like he's been stitched up.

 

The girl could have blocked him immediately if she wasn't interested and instead "filmed it" and presumably he didn't have her messages because it's Snapchat.

 

How did he get her Snapchat name in the first place? Her friend had to google him? Yeah right. 

 

It's been a honey trap and he's walked into it. 

Yep...it's all the victim's fault.  What a surprise.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Briton said:

Yep...it's all the victim's fault.  What a surprise.

 

Victim?  Someone messages you that you don't want,  you block them. You don't film it and take it to the papers to make cash. 

 

Victim. ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Bluedell said:

Victim?  Someone messages you that you don't want,  you block them. You don't film it and take it to the papers to make cash. 

 

Victim. ?

So you think sending pictures of your genitals, unsolicited, to a women is okay?  Should be classed as a sex offence IMO.  Yes she's a victim but of course she's at fault here. Riiiight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Briton said:

So you think sending pictures of your genitals, unsolicited, to a women is okay?  Should be classed as a sex offence IMO.  Yes she's a victim but of course she's at fault here. Riiiight.

Do we know for sure it was unsolicited ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, craig said:

Do we know for sure it was unsolicited ?

I admit I'm assuming that; my reasoning is that she is now complaining.  Of course if she requested the idiot to send a picture of his tackle then  that's a different matter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, craig said:

Do we know for sure it was unsolicited ?

Lafferty would have produced a copy of the messages if she had asked for it. He may have been stitched up but he was a simple and willing target if so. The guy must have an IQ of 0.001.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, pete said:

Lafferty would have produced a copy of the messages if she had asked for it. He may have been stitched up but he was a simple and willing target if so. The guy must have an IQ of 0.001.

As GS says, snapchat messages aren't retained......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.