The Summer 2022 Rangers Transfer Window Rumours and Deals - Thread

[Bill 13,717]

26 minutes ago, Gonzo79 said:

Why the name calling?

 

Hoping the club bring in a decent player or two is hardly hysterical.  

 

 

Stop being a panty wetter.

[Bill 13,717]

19 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

but how many players need to go.... seems like its 1 quid in 5 reinvested. good luck to us if that's the level. 

 

what would we be doing this window if we hadn't sold bassey and made the CL. 

 

maybe we need to be more realistic thats fine but the level is quite shocking. 

I have a feeling when the annual accounts are released you will find that our financial options are nowhere near the level you think they are. Unless the money is actually in the bank today then expenditure has to be supported by debt and it's clear the board has little appetite for that. My guess is we need another successful selling cycle to allow what you want to see.

[Sutton_blows_goats 4,223]

Whats this panty wetter nonsense  

 

As if we haven't just went through the worst period in our history and still stuck by the team. Took doing after doing from that mob and stuck by our team. Got beaten to 2nd by Aberdeen and stuck by our team. Been managed by clowns like Pedro and Murty and stuck by our team. Got parped out of Europe by postmen from Luxembourg but stuck by the team. 

 

Now we have won 55. Made a European cup final. Qualified for the CL group stages against all odds. Picked up a Scottish cup for the first time in nearly 15 years. Sold a guy for 23 million. Being called a panty wetter because you would like to see a right winger come into the squad? Some take tbh.

 

[the gunslinger 3,366]

1 minute ago, Bill said:

I have a feeling when the annual accounts are released you will find that our financial options are nowhere near the level you think they are. Unless the money is actually in the bank today then expenditure has to be supported by debt and it's clear the board has little appetite for that. My guess is we need another successful selling cycle to allow what you want to see.

not having that we can negotiate purchase payments on incoming money dates. It's standard practice. 

 

i would be happy with 2 in 5 reinvested. but that may be an exponential scale in fairness. perhaps we sell Kamara for 10 and 8 gets reinvested. 

[the gunslinger 3,366]

1 minute ago, Sutton_blows_goats said:

Whats this panty wetter nonsense  

 

As if we haven't just went through the worst period in our history and still stuck by the team. Took doing after doing from that mob and stuck by our team. Got beaten to 2nd by Aberdeen and stuck by our team. Been managed by clowns like Pedro and Murty and stuck by our team. Got parped out of Europe by postmen from Luxembourg but stuck by the team. 

 

Now we have won 55. Made a European cup final. Qualified for the CL group stages against all odds. Picked up a Scottish cup for the first time in nearly 15 years. Sold a guy for 23 million. Being called a panty wetter because you would like to see a right winger come into the squad? Some take tbh.

 

we aren't allowed to be unhappy with spending 12 million even after all we have raised. We are supposed to be happy to cough up 180 quid for 3 games though. 

 

At some point this board will go to far even with everything they have done

 

[Bill 13,717]

24 minutes ago, the gunslinger said:

but how many players need to go.... seems like its 1 quid in 5 reinvested. good luck to us if that's the level. 

 

what would we be doing this window if we hadn't sold bassey and made the CL. 

 

maybe we need to be more realistic thats fine but the level is quite shocking. 

Have you considered the possibility that the board is looking for an opportunity for shareholders to sell the club or at least a big chunk of it. Any valuation will be largely based on demonstrating financial strength, not just boots on the park. "No debt, money in the bank, successful player trading, Euro final, income growth, etc" I'm not saying that's what's happening, only that there can be many agendas in business, not all of which are obvious.

[Bill 13,717]

1 minute ago, the gunslinger said:

we aren't allowed to be unhappy with spending 12 million even after all we have raised. We are supposed to be happy to cough up 180 quid for 3 games though. 

 

At some point this board will go to far even with everything they have done

 

[the gunslinger 3,366]

16 minutes ago, Bill said:

Have you considered the possibility that the board is looking for an opportunity for shareholders to sell the club or at least a big chunk of it. Any valuation will be largely based on demonstrating financial strength, not just boots on the park. "No debt, money in the bank, successful player trading, Euro final, income growth, etc" I'm not saying that's what's happening, only that there can be many agendas in business, not all of which are obvious.

fuck that

[Gonzo79 13,679]

34 minutes ago, Bill said:

Stop being a panty wetter.

[Sutton_blows_goats 4,223]