BEARGER

By Willie Vass. http://willievass.photoshelter.com/gallery/300717-Sheffield-Weds-v-Rangers/G0000Q7vNuSCLeYc/C0000YUE0RPX0Egg

Did not get a minute today. Is he injured or just so unfit?

Robinson is not and never has been a Rangers fan. He saw an opportunity to get some free publicity and make make money at the same time, the tims obliged him.

I see the @rsholes with flares were out as usual.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3tBc40GwHJk

Murray Wallace has been here before.

Lewis Muir will join Gala Fairydean on loan for the first half of the season, to gain valuable First Team experience in the Lowland League.

Aye you're correct, I also know hehaw about photoshop, as you have pointed out.

From NARSA. Confirmed: @RangersFC go to @swfc on Sunday and it's live on @RangersTV. Kick off time is 10am EST/7am PST. ⚪️

IPSO and BBC Complaints Dear Member Club 1872 would like to inform members and the wider Rangers support that in the past day or so we have submitted several complaints to both the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) and the the BBC Trust. These complaints are regarding the coverage of the final result in the ‘Big Tax Case’ and also the recent decision of the SPFL to draw a line under the calls from Celtic and other vested interests in Scottish football to further penalise Rangers for use of an Employee Benefit Trust scheme. Some of these complaints are for lack of accuracy and others, specifically regarding BBC Scotland, are for what we consider to be biased reporting in favour of the previously mentioned vested interests. These reports are in our view designed to misinform and prejudice the general public against Rangers and have contained none of the balance required of the BBC. We hope and expect these complaints to be upheld but do not envisage having a definitive outcome to any of them for several weeks or months as we work our way through the complaints processes. With respect for those processes we won’t make any further comment until the outcome is known. It will not surprise anyone in the Rangers support to know that the IPSO complaint is for an article which appeared in the Daily Record newspaper. We would like to thank the Rangers community for the fantastic support we have had for our #ChangeTheRecord campaign. We intend to continue this campaign into the new season and hope that more and more Rangers fans are becoming aware of the need for us to fight for fairer coverage for our football club. Club 1872

A short note on tax law for Rangers and Celtic fans Jolyon Maugham 41 mins ago I write to explain a point of law that has occupied much of my twitter feed for the last couple of days. It may help to say that I am a Queen’s Counsel specialising in tax law. And I have no commercial or personal connection to Rangers (I use that name in a vernaculous rather than a legal sense) or its successor entities or (as far as I am aware) anyone connected with the club or those entities. I have said that it is not accurate to describe Rangers’ use of EBTs as “illegal” or “unlawful”. And here is why. You might think about the purpose of tax law as being to draw lines in the sand: fall on one side of the line and your liability will be (lower) x; fall on the other side and it will be (higher) y. Rangers entered into certain transactions which they hoped and (I understand) expected would attract liability x but which the Supreme Court decided attracted liability y. It is not “illegal” or “unlawful” to attract a higher liability than you want. And nor is it illegal or unlawful to transact to try and attract liability x but to fail and, nevertheless, to attract liability y. We self-assess our liability to tax. Putting it another way, HMRC ask us questions in a self-assessment form, we answer them, and those answers have as their consequence that we owe a particular sum in tax. We also promise HMRC that we believe the answers are right. If we give HMRC answers that lead to the conclusion that we owe x in tax and a court later says that our answers were wrong and we owe y in tax that does not establish, on its own, that we have behaved unlawfully or illegally. It is not unlawful or illegal to make an honest mistake. If, in completing the self-assessment form, we gave answers that we did not believe to be right, we would have behaved unlawfully or illegally. But I am not aware of any evidence that Rangers gave answers in its self-assessment form that it did not believe to be right. And nor, so far as I am aware, is this an allegation that HMRC has advanced. What about a situation where Rangers gave misleading answers to HMRC outside the self-assessment form? Certainly it would be very poor behaviour. And I can imagine circumstances in which this might be unlawful. But, on its own, this fact – if fact it is – does not enable the conclusion to be drawn that Rangers has broken any law.

A short note on tax law for Rangers and Celtic fans Jolyon Maugham 41 mins ago I write to explain a point of law that has occupied much of my twitter feed for the last couple of days. It may help to say that I am a Queen’s Counsel specialising in tax law. And I have no commercial or personal connection to Rangers (I use that name in a vernaculous rather than a legal sense) or its successor entities or (as far as I am aware) anyone connected with the club or those entities. I have said that it is not accurate to describe Rangers’ use of EBTs as “illegal” or “unlawful”. And here is why. You might think about the purpose of tax law as being to draw lines in the sand: fall on one side of the line and your liability will be (lower) x; fall on the other side and it will be (higher) y. Rangers entered into certain transactions which they hoped and (I understand) expected would attract liability x but which the Supreme Court decided attracted liability y. It is not “illegal” or “unlawful” to attract a higher liability than you want. And nor is it illegal or unlawful to transact to try and attract liability x but to fail and, nevertheless, to attract liability y. We self-assess our liability to tax. Putting it another way, HMRC ask us questions in a self-assessment form, we answer them, and those answers have as their consequence that we owe a particular sum in tax. We also promise HMRC that we believe the answers are right. If we give HMRC answers that lead to the conclusion that we owe x in tax and a court later says that our answers were wrong and we owe y in tax that does not establish, on its own, that we have behaved unlawfully or illegally. It is not unlawful or illegal to make an honest mistake. If, in completing the self-assessment form, we gave answers that we did not believe to be right, we would have behaved unlawfully or illegally. But I am not aware of any evidence that Rangers gave answers in its self-assessment form that it did not believe to be right. And nor, so far as I am aware, is this an allegation that HMRC has advanced. What about a situation where Rangers gave misleading answers to HMRC outside the self-assessment form? Certainly it would be very poor behaviour. And I can imagine circumstances in which this might be unlawful. But, on its own, this fact – if fact it is – does not enable the conclusion to be drawn that Rangers has broken any law.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Bobmalcolm12/status/890258568049459201/video/1 Could not get it to,work from fs post. So posted again.

Do you see any cards in the photo:laugh2:

Green Brigade have organised a "strip the titles" card display for tonight. Photo attached.

Here are the details of the facility that will accept coaches of Rangers supporters on Sunday. Owlerton Greyhound Stadium, Penistone Road, Hillsborough, Sheffield – POST CODE S6 2DE. This venue is only 500 metres from Hillsborough Football Stadium. The stadium will be open from 09:30hrs until kick off. There will be refreshments available at the greyhound stadium. Parking will be free for coaches and mini buses. Please do NOT park in the city centre as there are no coach parking facilities that are suitable. Further information can be obtained at the website http://www.owlertonstadium.co.uk .

Follow Follow is now a shambles, wrong words, add ons, too fast. Young bears including UB don't know the correct words.

What was the attendance today?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6b-EdmsoNL4

It's obvious one of them is Sebo, the other?