aweebluesoandso

There is a massive story here, Daly did two Documentaries, one called "The Men Who Sold The Jersey's" Well how about a documentary now called " The Establishment Men Who Tried to Destroy an Institution" Establishment Men i mean men and women in high places like HMRC, SFA, SPL, the Law and Politics. They are all involved in the hate-fest that tried to destroy our club. Some have been unmasked but there a many who are still to be outed.

The last thing we need at this crucial junction is in-fighting between supporters groups.

I didn't want to be too ambitious mentioning Ibrox, but since you have Craig, i'll reiterate. If the support owned Ibrox it would be the perfect vehicle for my money, It would be owned by the Rangers support in trust for the benefit of the club and the wider Rangers family. We the support could charge the club a pepper corn rent of say £1 per annum, the supporters vehicle pay the insurances, help in the up keep and maintenance, The club could share the cost of the maintenance, but hopefully it would be reducing it's overall yearly bill. If the RST and Rangers First could release some of their monthly subscriptions into a Ibrox ownership scheme, i'm sure, (well i definitely would) they would get more of the support joining in on this sort of scheme. More money coming in and helping the club, more influence in the club for the support.

I have already got shares through the RST and also put money into other joint share schemes like the one Gersnets own. I'm now looking beyond shares, like i say, i want to put my money directly into Rangers, through a supporters run vehicle, i think doing it that give gives the supports another avenue of influence in the club. Especially if we own assets say like the Albion Car Park. The supports would own it, but by setting up a trust agreement the club would still get the benefit of the money taken in car park fees. it's a win win for the club, they get a large fee for selling it and still get the income, but the supporters own the ground in perpetuity for the benefit of the club. The idea of direct financing can work in other ways too, the club get the money from the supporters for Ibrox redevelopment's and maintenance. We the support are the club so why can't we own some of it?

I said something similar a few weeks ago, the Rst and Rangers First should be offering the club loans. That could be at a date suitable to the club, be turned into shares or assets. I'm looking for an option through these fans groups to put money directly into the club (not for shares) for Ibrox rebuilding, or purchasing assets on behalf of the support, to be held in trust and used for the benefit of the club.

Don't dare call the young-uns Sheep Shaggers after this result lol.

Here's a thought, if Warbs had been appointed our manager a the start of last season, i think we would be back in the top league. Not only that but some of the players we binned would still be playing for us and we would be challenging the Dhims. Warbs does seem to get the best out of players, when they fail to perform, it's not for lack of motivation, it's a lack of ability or experience imo. The players we have kept from last season have upped their game and improved, apart from the injury prone player.

Interim decision, so it could still stand for voting at a later date.

I think that is in line with the Rst vote, nearly everyone is speaking from the same hymn sheet now, which bodes well for future joint agreements.

I agree, we need a player first and foremost who can play the game well . But has an arrogance or gallus attitude, up in your face plenty of bottle. type. Pity as there's not many Sourness's about ?

I tend to keep out of saying much in these type of threads, through lack of subject knowledge, so leave the guys with the experience to lead the threads. So one question from me, does resolution go ahead for voting at the agm, or is the club barred from putting the resolution up for vote?

Ashley is a one nasty piece of work. but beatable.

If HMRC has lost the last appeal, they would have taken it to the Supreme Court. So nothing has changed apart from the now clear fact, that they won't get such a bias bench at the SC. That mere fact fills me with hope.

A pish poor manager who won't be in the Motherwell job for to long. Like his playing career all his failures are someone else's fault.

big vote in favour of the current board and the way they are handling things, which is good.

I read on another forum this Mooney chap is a Hearts fan? So i'm thinking he doesn't do irony, his club brought down a Banking group with many people losing their jobs, their debt's were conveniently disappeared. and they weren't remotely punished to anything like the level we were. We started at the bottom league, they went into the next league down and subsequently went back to the top league after only one season. Hearts a club that was part of the morally bankrupt cabal, Who fined and punished our club within a hairs breath from oblivion, Hearts got given every advantage, Rules were stretched or twisted for their benefit. That was morally indefensible.

Knows the top flight in Scotland, knows the opposition, knows a lot of the players there and their style, knows what's required......erm,....know what i mean? I'll take him for another season.

Mr English is obviously asking for a ban from the club, I would accommodate his request. When someone turns that bitter and unprofessional there is no reasoning with them,

Someone posted threatening and sectarian remarks on the RST facebook page, it has been removed and the police informed. Not many know what the content of the remarks were, but apparently some on here seem to think it's related to singing FTP at away games?

Think i read on another forum, it's been put in the hands of the Police. We need to stop suffering bigotry in silence we need to start talking about the high levels of hate, coming from various sources. like BBC Scotland employees, SNP MP's and Councillors.

One night? pussy. I was told it was character building when i got the nick for the weekend. lol

They like to dress it up as Integrity, but we know it for what it is BIGOTRY.

Without doubt Bearman, however Ashley has a habit of gravitating some dodgy associates into his company. Take Whyte then Green and a well known owner of a SPFL club. Who else benefits ,apart from himself, from him winning his case against the SFA, and the King fit and proper SFA ruling being overturned?

I'm convinced Ashley is getting prompted and encourage from a sinister source, Someone within the SFA/SPFL perhaps?

Hope Santa brings me that book for my Christmas, especially as i have been trying very hard not to be a wee so and so.