Jump to content

 

 

BrahimHemdani

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    11,099

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by BrahimHemdani

  1. BrahimHemdani
    That comment is totally and completely out of order; you should be ashamed of yourself.
  2. BrahimHemdani
    Yes, sorry about that StB; it came to me in the middle of the night that I hadn't totally taken your moniker in vain as you did indicate interest in attending but were good enough to say that you didn't want to disappoint. I got up early to post an apology but you beat me to it by several hours. We could still squeeze you in and I'm sure your attendance would make for lively debate.
  3. BrahimHemdani
    Both the Easdales or Mr A Easdale and Mr C Houston?
  4. BrahimHemdani
    I wasn't aware of that but I don't think it really matters because I don't think Mr Houston should have approached him in public, with or without permission. I did also say that Mr A Easdale should have stepped down whist the internal investigation was taking place; should step down if there is an IC investigation; and IMO his position as a Director of the Football Club would be untenable if he is found guilty of such an offence. Whislt I am confident that your last remark is not aimed at anyone in particular; nonetheless the irony of the situation was not lost on me.
  5. BrahimHemdani
    No one could accuse him of being shy that's for sure. BTW, I spoke to Craig in the street before the match and said as much to him, which he agreed. I also said that whilst I agreed with the SoS objectives I did not always agree with their methods. If I get the chance I will tell him my view on this as well; so I am not hiding.
  6. BrahimHemdani
    Yes, sorry about that; must have been reading too many of StB's posts!
  7. BrahimHemdani
    For sure; but do you really think that's going to happen or anything remotely close?
  8. BrahimHemdani
    Thanks to all who pointed that out, I HAD noticed. My point was that surely Mr King came with a plan, so I'm surprised that no details at all are available for the next few days.
  9. BrahimHemdani
    That's correct, so 9 with SC and son. A small but select band. Certainly could do with a few more. Andy S and StB are still possibles I believe. I suppose it's about right when you consider that there were 9 votes for the 26th of April but with the benefit of hindsight my suggestion of tomorrow might have worked out better but that was out of self interest not because I predicted when we would win the league. I'll need to look back and see if there was anyone who said they would come and hasn't come through (leaving out AS & Frankie and the wedding party). We can send them an email followed by a lawyer's letter. I am working on a couple of guys who sit behind me to join up here and come along. If everyone who is going could bring one more that would make it a lot better.
  10. BrahimHemdani
    Is it just me or do others find this whole spectacle particularly unedifying and embarrassing at a time when we have not been short of embarrassments? I agree with the objectives of the SOS: 1) Keep the stadium in clubs name to avoid Coventry situation 2) clear accounts which prove proper running of the club 3) a board that keep the club off the front pages and are above reproach who wouldn't; but what is the point of having an objective to keep the Club off the front pages if at the same time your own activities put it on the same front pages? Did Mr Houston think he could approach Mr Easdale at the Director's Box after the match and not find pictures and a report in the Record; or did he just not think at all? If Mr Houston somehow thinks he is a martyr because he refuses to be told that you cannot call a person with a spent conviction for VAT fraud a crook or allow others to use your web site for that purpose and letters go to his parents house and he publishes the whole sorry saga, then I think he is sadly mistaken. All he needed to do was say sorry, it won't happen again. He and others can have whatever opinion they like of Mr A Easdale but there are limits to what you can publish or allow to be published and it seems he may have crossed that line. It's clear that he has little sympathy on here at least. Why not just point out the error to the lawyers and give them your address for future communication. Surely that would be the obvious way to stop further correspondence going to his parents house? The lawyers aren't going to serve papers by email. Sending Sheriff Officers does sound a bit extreme but the answer to that lies in Mr Houston's hands. As Bluebear rightly points out if Mr Houston has evidence, even prima facie evidence, of a breach of the Data Protection Act then he should write to the Information Commissioner not confront the alleged culprit in public. Of course Mr Easdale could clear all this up quite easily simply by stating how he obtained Mr Houston's parents' address. However the fact that apparently he doesn't feel obliged to do that doesn't make him guilty of any offence. That said surely he should have stood down from his position as Chair of the Football Club Board whilst the investigation was taking place and if there is a further investigation then he should think about the Club first and his own vanity second. Mr Houston might want to consider whether pursuing this in the manner that he has done aids or hinders the otherwise worthwhile SOS campaign.
  11. BrahimHemdani
    That's everyone paid in full except SC who is having some minor banking issues, thanks guys, that made it a lot easier.
  12. BrahimHemdani
    You'll be pleased to know that it's now showing as a credit for for Monday Mr AIS. I'm tempted to say which branch it passed through but once again discretion......... 17/03/2014 £18.00 Balance in Account £126.00 £18.00 Counter Credit the gunslinger BGC
  13. BrahimHemdani
    It's known as discretion.
  14. BrahimHemdani
    I'll stick with the crema catalana thanks.
  15. BrahimHemdani
    And will only be released on payment of £18 (inc VAT)
  16. BrahimHemdani
    What "clear path forward" is that? What are the terms of the investment and how much is it? Six paragraphs and not one word of detail about the scheme or the proposed investment. If the scheme is only short term i.e. till the season ticket money is paid over, how will that secure the assets for generations to come? Talk of "slashing" costs and "wilderness" may appeal to some but it really adds nothing to the case.
  17. BrahimHemdani
    Probably better stop this line of thought lest we get in trouble with UEFA.
  18. BrahimHemdani
    I didn't say I had a plan only that withholding ST money to the start of next season doesn't work unless the club agree to hold the seats, which they won't. However, since you ask, I am supporting RangersFirst, because I believe it has a realistic chance of accumulating the £1,000,000 or so needed to get 5% of the shares in the first instance.
  19. BrahimHemdani
    That had me laughing out loud. Are you referring to those born overseas or those born in the UK?
  20. BrahimHemdani
    Leave you to work that one out
  21. BrahimHemdani
    Looks like he could do with a shave.
  22. BrahimHemdani
    Correct but they still need to be paid over the summer and we have no other source of income.
  23. BrahimHemdani
    That's the point; if your house was worth £100,000 would you pledge it as security for a £10,000 loan; not if you had any choice you wouldn't.
  24. BrahimHemdani
    SPIVS Deduct 30% Commission from Fan's Dinner Money Shocker
  25. BrahimHemdani
    Seriously you might want to get your bank to run a check, it's not there and everyone else's went in instantly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.