Jump to content

 

 

BrahimHemdani

  • Posts

    11,099
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BrahimHemdani

  1. In theory, yes it is. In 2010 we were looking at 30,000 paying £20/month over 5 years to raise the £30 million said to be needed at that time. Even if some group could raise £4.8/5.0 million right this minute; there aren't 19/20 million shares for sale at 25/26p nor are there likely to be any time soon. Investors like Laxey and R&M are not going to sell their shares at that price.
  2. It has been said by some that Mr Dingwall is a major reason for that and whilst I do not know the whys and wherefores of this new initiative this would appear to be yet another example.
  3. It has been said by some that Mr Dingwall is a a major reason for that and without knowing the whys and wherefores of this new initiative; this would appear to be yet another instance. Duplicated at #10, tried to delete this one twice.
  4. Rearrange these words into a well known phrase or saying: GLASS HOUSES STONES PEOPLE IN SHOULDN'T THROW.
  5. And it will show them we're not a shower of dummies.
  6. BD, I detailed the Funds in the OP; both are certainly above average risk. I agree that a lot of the issues are confidential or market sensitive or both; but I asked the questions that I and others on here had in mind; knowing full well that it was unlikely they would answer despite the initial assurance. I seriously doubt that they expected such detailed questions. I will go back to them with the comments and see if I can persuade them to answer 5 at least if not 11-14; but I'm not holding my breath.
  7. A US Senator is in deep sh*t for something very similar, perhaps that was in Mr Easdale's mind at the time WASHINGTON — Embattled New York Republican Rep. Michael Grimm threatened to "break" a NY1 reporter and throw him off a balcony after President Obama's State of the Union address Tuesday night. Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/new-york-rep-michael-grimm-threatens-reporter-asked-fundraising-allegations-article-1.1594857#ixzz2rzVSBqMj
  8. Which is perhaps where said convicted VAT fraudster might be best placed.
  9. It is worth noting that Mr Atkinson was a Director of St Mirren FC from May 2010 to August 2013 when he resigned following the failure of his fan-backed bid to buy the Club http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23721154
  10. Oh no, Andy, I'll tell them like it is, full and unexpurgated; I think they'll get the message.
  11. Just as I predicted at #14 "His basic stance will be I am not even half way through my 120-day review; I'll meet you again after that. " A clever man, he appears to have asked more questions than he answered.
  12. The RST didn't raise a third of that when the chips were down; 25x more shares were bought by fans individually than through the scheme.
  13. Just as I predicted or worse still sounds like a waste of time.
  14. You are obviously entitled to your opinion Andy; but I think you are wrong. They are obviously very constrained in what they can say in public but they have actually answered 3 of the questions in those two sentences, albeit in general terms. Nonetheless I will convey to them everyone one's sentiments who cares to comment.
  15. River & Mercantile have sent me the following statement in response to the questions. “I have bought shares in Rangers as it is a valuable football franchise, that is materially underpriced by the stockmarket. I intend to be a long term shareholder, supportive of Management and Corporate Governance that restores value for all stakeholders.” I have indicated my disappointment that they have not answered any of the specific questions and said that I will let them know how folks on here respond.
  16. There was comment alleged to be from a "club insider" but you are right, no actual confirmation and no denial either; which you might have expected in current circumstances. I stand corrected on the Tribunal; but whilst Rangers may not have enough evidence to dismiss him, I can't see that he could make much of a case himself.
  17. I was just about to type that when I read your comment. Assuming he's on say £2,000/week perhaps less, it would most likely be a cash saving but you can't make Jim Stewart redundant and then immediately appoint Simonsen. Maybe Stewart would retire, but I see he's only 59, looks older.
  18. I fail to see how saying that you don't think someone will make it as a manager is "mocking" a former player; it's just a matter of opinion, it might not have been expressed too well and perhaps I fell into the trap of agreeing, but it's fair comment I'd say. At least it's not the utter trash that was posted as the Rangers v Brechin thread (which now appears to have been withdrawn thank goodness).
  19. My feeling is that he will not say anything different from what he said in the TE interview; just put a different way perhaps depending on the actual questions asked. His basic stance will be I am not even half way through my 120-day review; I'll meet you again after that.
  20. I think the answer might be that Rangers didn't giver him notice " it was mutually agreed" that he leave and get a year's pay; but then the question would be WHY; since he couldn't get more than his contract stipulated at a Tribunal.
  21. They have promised a reply, probably in the form of statement by tomorrow.
  22. Also added "Do you have a target selling price?" which was in my original list, though I doubt they will answer that. Zappa, please close this thread; I'll start a new one with the reply.
  23. I'll add something like "is your investment philosophy compatible with the strategy required to manage a successful football club"
  24. I am sure you are right but I am equally sure that yoou will understand why I worded it that way.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.