the gunslinger

we really should be doing better here with the money we have spent.

don't think anyone is expecting it to change. Doesn't make it right doesn't mean we have to like it and contrary to some peoples beliefs we are allowed to feel like that and discuss it. You really just have to hope this gaffe doesn't see the offering fail.

it was open again by the time the CVA was put together. Mother were in admin for years without being liquidated. There we more option open than a rush to put green in charge for as little as possible.

why they all went for free 4 months later anyway. When motherwell went into admin the administrator ran them for 3 years and paid of the bills by selling players and brought them out of admin.

not surprised he tore them apart.

don't think i could support a team with ramos in it.

poor but hopefully we can keep him away from the flag at least.

i fear my sarcasm in this thread has been wasted....

he wasn't allowed in for the presentation. Why would we allow him in for flag day?

this thread is hilarious. it's an irony overload.

Everything you say could apply to your whining about club 1872. I am surprised you are so upset about it here.

Dave kings shares at 20p are looking more attractive now too.

sensibly. If you can buy these currently for 5p less why pay more. Then we have them taking the piss. It's hardly a good sales pitch. Just looks like they want the money but to protect their investment and control. that may be ok with you it won't be with everyone. when club 1872 buy more next month at 20p this will just look worse. I also suspect the last of the directors getting them at 20p isn't behind us. All that said if ever their was a time to get away with conning money out the support it is now. Truth be told if it was the only option I would have put in if i could find the cash. But i have lost a little respect and trust in them.

and the fact that club 1872 will buy shares again at 20p next month? I think it is more than morally. I think this raised questions over their purchases if we follow your logic. You know legally.

still possible to get shares at 20p with the money going to the club through club 1872. Depending on your plan for the shares of course.

i am saying they should offer others the chance they took recently.

just watching how the league was won. particularly liking them showing Ibrox in glorious sunshine and Sharkhead with storm clouds at the start.

but they already own rangers. I think your analogy is way off. perhaps my fault though. What i meant was they didn't bump up the price when they were converting loans last month.

they are shafting us financially. or trying to. will backfire if it gives us a good start and we win the league.

worth noting that no one sued green when he was giving away shares at 1p although the Australian guy did threaten to until he got some.....

we must be up to a dozen players signed to try and replace Cadeias now.

Didn't maximize them when they were buying.......

issued by the club for sure. 500k gone into rangers via shares this year. They are only buying from rangers for a period just now.

Disappointing and will no doubt lead to Dave Kings shares looking more attractive. Not ideal as we really want any cash going into rangers.

if they are happy to stay keep them even if they go for free. Perhaps with the caveat of a really good offer coming in. we could sell 30 million quid of players and lose out on 45 of CL money 2 years running. of course we could keep them and still lose out but we can always sell at that point. we should only be buying players who make us better now. Build on where we are. All that said ultimately the finances will dictate.