Jump to content

 

 

the gunslinger

  • Posts

    28,876
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by the gunslinger

  1. Bit different given time scales ETC but in identical circumstances yes. I certainly would support us dragging their players out the trenches to face us.
  2. Horrible news. at his peak he may well have been the best keeper in the world.
  3. i would think both would be possible given he would have to miss games and be subbed a lot.
  4. i would want 15 for Hagi right now. They know their only chance of ever affording him is now while he is injured and are at it.
  5. Thought you weren't bothered.
  6. Forfeit if needs be.
  7. good news. Needs as much rest as possible. Plus we shouldn't be forcing Ukraine into this game.
  8. if he was really cheap we should see if he is still a player or finished. The very very rare glimpses we got of him he was really good and certainly provides goals from midfield we need.
  9. he didn't get near an opposition player for ages after arriving.
  10. Anyone not getting a game for Juranovic isn't worth much if anything.
  11. perhaps players clubs are prepared to loan out are of questionable quality.
  12. I think loans are patently worse. Certainly at rangers.
  13. the best terms for the best players are always permanent though. At least for rangers. But if loans were no better or worse why so many failures.
  14. Yes fit. He was clearly weeks away when we signed him. Kind of became months.
  15. I disagree on Diallo he wasn't injured he was never going to be for the game and we knew that going in apparently. we could have had soutter with the money spent on either of them and Barasic wouldn't have been on the park as a simple example. our January window lost us the league and that was almost exclusively loan deals. The old firm game is just part of that. We might have lost that game anyway. We also might have been 6 clear if we had acted differently when we did lose. It looked great at the time but history will show it to be shambolic.
  16. Some can be for sure. At rangers for every on of those i am fairly sure we get 4 or 5 utter wastes of time and money.
  17. the one on the pitch was very culpable the one already bombed out by then was no use to us when needed and the one not even fit was the worst of the lot. We loaned in Jan instead of buying and it cost us the league. Partly as it was so late in the day. partly because loan deals are shite. partly who we loaned. i don't think i am saying anything here most people disagree with TBH.
  18. there are the odd exceptions. Davis and Kent are two.
  19. i think it's a fact to say the year we didn't have loans we won the league. the others we didn't. They were certainly minimal. to be honest i can only think of 1 working and that was davis.
  20. yeah the other one wasn't fit enough to contribute. not sure why you find it so funny.
  21. celtc at least kid on they are buying players to boost renewals. come on rangers.
  22. i do apart from your daft one where they weren't even here. In some cases directly in others by not contributing for differing reasons. notice you haven't mentioned the humping at parkhead wisely.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.