Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

  • Posts

    13,615
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. Which youths? Massive step up from youth level to first team.
  2. Grezda has had injuries. Worall is a loanee who’s done ok. He’ll return to Forest at the end of the season. Davis is now past it.
  3. A very good debut indeed. Possibly the only plus point today.
  4. Exactly why we shouldn’t be signing players in their mid-thirties
  5. Club1872 should contact UEFA & FIFA. Get them involved. TheSFA Compliance Officer role needs to be abolished. It has been shown to be totally inconsistent & open to bias.
  6. I wouldn’t have attended in the first place. Two wallopers
  7. For me it’s not about whether incidents should or shouldn’t have got yellow cards or red cards. It’s whether the SFA Compliance Officer can over-rule an incident the referee had clearly SEEN. If so then that is very dangerous indeed in my opinion
  8. Absolutely. The problem here is we have got a Compliance Officer whose bias & inconsistency is there for all to see. She isn’t smart enough to hide it
  9. The SFA compliance Officer role should be abolished. It was a role created for the yahoos whereby they’d get all others restrospectively punished whilst they didn’t. I see Darnell Johnson the hibs player has lost his appeal against a 2 game ban despite getting a yellow card at the time of the incident. This is scandalous. If the incident is SEEN by the referee there should be no further action. This incident was not UNSEEN. Same goes for Allan McGregor’s appeal today. If SEEN by the referee that should be the end of the matter
  10. She is/was a Celtic ST holder. Like her predecessors
  11. Was Power not given a yellow card for that ‘challenge ‘ on Jack ? If so that should be the end of it whether we like it or not. The referee has SEEN the incident. It is not UNSEEN whereby retrospective action could be taken. Same should now apply to MacGregor tomorrow. The referee has SEEN the incident & no further action should be taken. It is not UNSEEN. Also the hibs player who was offered a 2 game ban after getting booked against the yahoos last week should get this disgraceful punishment rescinded too and the stupid bitch of a CO sacked from her position
  12. With reference to the SFA Q&A, who decides which ‘unseen incidents by the match officials’ get selected & which ones don’t get selected from all of the fixtures? They don’t say that do they? Is it the CO? Sportscene? The Daily Record? Who? The whole concept of a Compliance Officer reviewing games retrospectively is open to abuse. It’s blatantly obvious if you have a CO with an allegiance (like Clare Whyte has to Celtic) then there will be a temptation to show favouritism. Clare Whyte has shown herself to be much worse than her predecessors McGlennan & Lunny. The SFA Compliance Officer position should be abolished immediately.
  13. Where’s Rhegan’s successor Ian Maxwell these days? seen & heard little from him these past few months. Does he think the CO is doing a good job & is impartial?
  14. Nothing in there that surprises me. Clare Whyte is one of the most biased, corrupt football officials I’ve ever seen. Her record in such a short period of time is there for all to see.
  15. Rangers (along with others hopefully) should be doing everything possible to get the SFA Compliance Officer role abolished.
  16. Brendan’s desperate to get away. Looks embarrassed to be there now.Cant blame him.
  17. If Allan McGregor’s appeal fails next week he should immediately inform the SFA he no longer wishes to be considered for Scotland international squads. We need to start somewhere to challenge this corrupt compliance officer nonsense
  18. Does anyone from Rangers have any comment to make on this ? Maybe our MD called Stewart Robertson?
  19. AFAIK the SFA compliance officer can only cite incidents of simulation or violence from games the referee may have missed and rescind red cards or reduce to yellows. Nothing more. From the yahoos v hibs game last week the compliance officer has offered a hubs player a 2 game ban for a tackle he received a yellow card for by the referee. The compliance officer cannot do this as it is out with her remit. Questions need to be asked about this. What we need now is clubs(including Rangers) to step up & get the compliance officer role within the SFA abolished. It is very clear which club initiated this position within the SFA and its reasons for doing so. The games which the compliance officer selects for analysis inevitably don’t have incidents involving Celtic players up for scrutiny We now have the third person in this compliance officer role & three have been lawyers & Celtic ST holders. I do think that should itself raise questions. The SFA, under the guidance/influence of Peter Lawwell over the past few years I’d suggest , spent years convincing both UEFA & FIFA about the merits of a compliance officer before getting the go-ahead. Why this position is needed is beyond me because surely the referees supervisor (a guy calledJohnFlrming last I heard) could deal with this. What we’re seeing now is blatant corruption & bias within Scottish football. My only hope is those currently within Rangers will join with other clubs to fight this & get the compliance officer abolished
  20. Broke with tradition & attended an away game tonight. Dreadful game but sure we’ll do the business back at ibrox. On supporters bus heading home now ????
  21. It’s not referees from outside Scotland we need Brendan. It’s a compliance officer from outside Scotland we need. To date, all three we’ve had have been lawyers & ST holders at Celtic Park. Is that just coincidence Brendan ? Certainly did you a big favour last Wednesday against Hibs didn’t she?
  22. There’s no doubt in my mind there’s a campaign on & off the park to drive Morelos out of Scottish football.
  23. Instead of mhedia cretins going on about refereeing inconsistencies how about the inconsistency by the compliance officer in his/her selection of incidents ? who decides which incidents are selected & which aren’t?
  24. Absolutely. The dignified silence must end now.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.