RANGERRAB

Been to Murray Park or Ibrox lately or read the forthcoming UEFA regulations? Millions are needed for repairs and upgrades and that's what I'd use the raising of finance against the assets for not spunking on a couple of players. . Can someone explain exactly what these repairs & upgrades are? What are the forthcoming UEFA regulations?

Why was Easdale having a criminal record unacceptable but King having a criminal record acceptable? Under the SA Statute of Limitations the State can resurrect the 300 + criminal charges he faced within the next 20 years and lets not forget some of these charges were fraud, money laundering, racketeering and many more offences. Think this guy will pass the SFA FAPP ? Also can you tell me why did King want the CVA rejected in 2012 during administration?

not much chance of that though is there?

you say we rid ourselves of a guy who did time. DK was an extremely lucky man not to be doing time in SA for 40 odd tax convictions unless I'm mistaken. Or is that different ? Anyway I'll leave this debate now. It's clear people such as yourself are unable to see beyond this man & his promises(50million, 30million or whatever)but don't say you've not been warned...............

But is our top scorer. What does that tell you about our strikers?

Never seen this guy play.Is he pacy at all ? We need pace in the wide areas up front

Who's going to replace the goals Law has scored then? Goal-scoring midfielders are much-sought after as they ease the burden on the strikers.IMO he should be kept(if he wants to stay) because of the goals he gets Rangers biggest issue is who plays up front next season as all the forwards are out of contract and unlikely to get new contracts. Their contribution this season hasn't been great although Clarke has been better in the past few games

Once DK becomes chairman and eventually invests whatever amount it is he(or one of his companies probably) has said they will then fine, I shall put my hands up and say I was proved wrong. Your unyielding faith in this man astonishes me given his SARS convictions. Yes I know he's a Rangers man but I think there are times when I think you have to look beyond the fact that he is a Rangers supporter and see the bigger picture

It is simply sheer madness that a country the size of Scotland has a top division that doesn't have its two biggest clubs in it. Financial reasons alone dictate that in terms of TV deals, sponsorships etc.. Yet that is what those clowns Regan & Doncaster allowed to happen in the summer of 2012.Had the SFA had chief executive been fit-for purpose he(or she) would have shown leadership at that time.Allowing Rangers to get put in SFL3 was lunacy. But we all know why don't we? Because Liewell pulls the strings and getting Rangers out of the way allowed his club a free crack at the CL every year. But at what price has the come to the rest? They have no money and half empty stadiums every week. The days are long gone when clubs could survive on gate money alone so sponsorships, TV money etc is crucial. And with no Rangers there's no chance of that. The professional game is dying in Scotland. Everyone can see that but no one wants to do what is needed to stop it's inevitable death

Aplogies misread. However I do think that there are additional means of revenue in the top division. I think this is something Paul Murray has alluded to

There's more revenue in the top division through higher ticket prices, sponsorships etc. Its not just about attendances

An important hurdle was cleared last week when the Court of Session validated him as potential Rangers director but this was King being declared “fit and proper” only so far as the insolvency act is concerned. You don't think his 40 odd SARS tax convictions will affect him being able to pass the FAPP ? Yes I will wait to hear 'the full extent of the carnage'. How long will that be then ?

Delete this post

So after spending how many years trying to get onto the board now they are now actually on the board & haven't yet outlined their future plans? That might not worry you but it certainly is starting to worry me. Yes I do know King has to pass a FAPP test. He won't though will he ?

ST renewals start next month. Can't see too many renewing until there is some sort of communication from the board about funding/investment

So when will they reveal their plans for the future ? next month? next year? Let's not kid ourselves, Rangers are still surviving month-to-month on loans. That cannot continue indefinitely. Is DK going to invest ? If so when & how much? And when will DK take up a directorship or chairmanship now he's been cleared by the CoS?

Whenever Rangers win 4-0 I'm happy.

A few more performances like today & the crowds will return.

Assuming young SInnamon not quite ready,then because we haven't got a decent RB ?

But only if McCall understands he got his team selection & tactics wrong on Wednesday night against QOS and doesn't repeat those mistakes. Rangers are still conceding too many goals & not scoring enough.The right team selection & tactics would go a long way to rectifying that. For example, Darren McGregor looks to me our best defender this season. Is it best to play him out at RB to accommodate McCulloch in the team or put him right in the central heart of the defence? Is it really that difficult?

Scrapping the outdated BBC licence fee would solve all these problems instantaneously. The BBC(including our chums at Pacific quay) would then have to live in the real world and employing Rangers-hating pondlife such as Spence,Cosgrove,Spiers etc would make no commercial sense with plummeting viewing/listening figures

Whilst I'd say McCall got his team selection & tactics badly wrong last night, perhaps the biggest challenge he faces is trying to make Rangers harder to play against and harder to beat. That means, for starters, conceding a lot fewer goals, something he has to put right before play-offs. I'd suggest the 3-5-2 system QOS used last night would be better-suited for us as it allows 5 in defence when defending and five in MF going forward. Defensively we always seem likely to concede so having greater numbers at the back should help although individual errors played a big part in the QOS goals last night What must not be repeated is last nights 4-4-2 where we had two up front, two wide men and Law and young Murdoch in central MF. It was far too cavalier an approach to a game against a team whose tactics at home on their plastic surface are often too invite a team to attack them then hit them on a quick counter.McCall must learn from last night's shambles before the play-offs or it is another unappealing season in the championship

I'd have thought after his ridiculous performance recently against Alloa that would have been the last we would have seen of him in a Rangers jersey. But it wasn't to be. There was a good delivery into the box for him late on but he couldn't get to it. Quelle Surprise

How was he to blame at their goals? Wallace was to blame for the first two & Crawford for their third

Although he screwed up badly last night with his team selection and tactics IMO.