Jump to content

 

 

RANGERRAB

 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13,612

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

 Content Type 

Everything posted by RANGERRAB

  1. RANGERRAB
    I don't think this board have the balls to sack McCoist.
  2. RANGERRAB
    SAF once said before you sign a player, check his attendance record. Unless we're signing Gordon on a pay-per-play basis (which I suspect we won't be) then this is a total waste of valuable resources
  3. RANGERRAB
    But both JW & PLG were in the top division......we've been totally unimpressive against part timers
  4. RANGERRAB
    Surely no other country would want an OF game ? The background to the next one will be problematic IMO. And they've caused it all by their actions I.e. Calling us cheats of perfectly legal EBT's, inventing fictitious debt levels, voting us out the SPL etc, etc
  5. RANGERRAB
    Will the board agree to this ? Signing Gordon on a contract would be a massive risk IMO given his injury record. Surely McCoist must realise there are other positions in this team which are far greater priority?
  6. RANGERRAB
    It certainly will be toxic......and the rest. After being accused of cheating thro' EBT's, trying to strip titles, voting us out the SPL and generally trying to put us out of business altogether I genuinely dread to think what the next game against them will be like. I'd be amazed if any other country would be daft enough to stage it
  7. RANGERRAB
    They may well do if the price remains low
  8. RANGERRAB
    A) no chance. King will not do this he has said so himself B) might happen at shares issue if insufficient existing shareholders don't take up their option C) unlikely because existing shareholders would have to consent D) unlikely board would get funding elsewhere even if secured borrowing which would not be good
  9. RANGERRAB
    Which will be what ?
  10. RANGERRAB
    You do realise those shares have to be offered to existing shareholders first?
  11. RANGERRAB
    It will be very interesting indeed to see if this board retain his services for next season
  12. RANGERRAB
    Trying to bully the financial institutions won't work and could be extremely dangerous
  13. RANGERRAB
    Not suggesting for a minute all's well but until there's a viable alternative we're where we are at the moment. Going to bottom tier meant we were never going to make money.We were always going to lose money starting at the bottom & going up the leagues in the shortest timescale possible. Don't get me wrong I think this board face big challenges in the months ahead most notably increasing revenue into the club. Are they up to those challenges ? Like you I have my doubts too but until there's a viable alternative we're stuck where we are but believe once we're back in the top division investment will be forthcoming
  14. RANGERRAB
    please explain how the 'club is being dragged down the swany' ? any excuse for a protest now methinks
  15. RANGERRAB
    who replaces them & who gets to choose their replacements then ?
  16. RANGERRAB
    The reqs had around 30% at the AGM. Much higher than I thought they'd get. I then expected DK to acquire shares(especially with the low share price) like Laxey & Prior did. If he then took the 30% the reqs got and added to his shareholding DK might have got the board would almost certainly have been ousted or at least the writing would have been on the wall for them. But he didn't and all we've had since is this constant sniping from the sidelines which is damaging the club. The time has now come for DK : put up or shut up.
  17. RANGERRAB
    If he's really interested in getting control he could have bought shares since the AGM. Like Prior & Laxey did.
  18. RANGERRAB
    If he buys shares he will get control but he won't do that up until now anyway. The forthcoming shares issue will tell us all we need to know about DK
  19. RANGERRAB
    I'm not even convinced he wants us on the cheap. He wants some sort of power without investing IMO.No doubt the two murrays involved too
  20. RANGERRAB
    If he really does have serious intentions then he has to acquire shares
  21. RANGERRAB
    Well I'm sure he'll get the opportunity to buy some shares at the forthcoming shares issue.......................
  22. RANGERRAB
    The time has now come for DK to acquire some sort of shareholding if he really has any intention of taking control at Rangers. Even a 5 to 10 percent shareholding would send out some sort of message.
  23. RANGERRAB
    Far from excessive I'd have thought.
  24. RANGERRAB
    Not sure I'd agree 1/7 is too high especially when you compare that to other clubs. The real challenge is to cut costs elsewhere but at the same time improve the first team squad. One area I'd target is MP. Given the fact the majority of the first team squad are recruited from other senior clubs do we really need all these youth teams, youth coaches etc ? How much does it cost to run the MP youth set-up ? unless it produces players who get into the first team and can then be sold every other year or so to the EPL and beyond(like Ajax do with the likes of Eriksen & Alderweid last summer) then it is a massive drain on finances.
  25. RANGERRAB
    FWIW I thought Alex Wilson & Scott Murdoch would have been ideal board members along with Frank Blin. Associating themselves with the Murrays double act was never going to get them elected
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.