

trublusince1982
-
Posts
3,660 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Everything posted by trublusince1982
-
If we win again it will get less than a page in the press if we lose 10 page pullout!
-
Would be over the moon if we get winks on loan far higher calibre than the other signings.
-
thanks for the comments mate. Any idea if warburton put forward the signings himself or did he sift through and select from players the club put to him through their scouting network?
-
its-time-rangers-gave-this-young-forward-a-chance
trublusince1982 replied to pete's topic in Rangers Chat
Agree wholeheartedly though I would like to see him at right mid -
Someone has just updated wiki to say halliday plays for Rangers. Must be true!lol Wabara hopefully not ,even Doncaster fans wanted rid surely we wouldn't go there. Hope the striker is decent
-
Mark Warburton urged ‘to step up recruitment’
trublusince1982 replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
are you happy with the standard so far? Would love to know jim Stewarts honest thoughts on foderingham. -
Mark Warburton urged ‘to step up recruitment’
trublusince1982 replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Weir has told us the problem. The club are identifying potential recruits and the management team decide which to sign but with the infrastructure being the same as old it identifies players only through the same agents that gave us the last bunch of useless players. The best prospect so far in my mind has came from Mulholland pity its for the youth team. Explains the Wilson's,Allan's and hallidays, irrespective of who the manager was violafc etc would have put these players forward to the club. Explains the delays, Warburton thinks the players being put forward are duff as well Think we were all wrong when we assumed Warburton identified prospective signings for brentford he didn't it was a team effort he had final say. -
If that excuse was the case then the brother or other would be taxed. Makes no difference
-
Can't see the older players looking up to Wilson or paying much attention.
-
Mark Warburton urged ‘to step up recruitment’
trublusince1982 replied to ian1964's topic in Rangers Chat
Very disappointed with this. The whole point of Warburton for me was he could cover the lack of scouts in the short term. Using the same agents and networks that advised on the last lot is nothing short of disgraceful. -
True all they players play at a higher level than those we are currently recruiting.while at the club they were deemed by the majority of the support as not good enough. that was the initial point
-
Reading the story in the sun today has me wondering how big a part Warburton had in identifying players. Sounds like he had final say rather than uncovering prospects. Would explain why we are still using the same old agents to put players forward with no new players that were either already known to us or played for Warburton before. Had expected talent we hadn't heard of before from far afield.
-
The mindset comes from the signings so far and the expected signings of eustace and wabara. Think the Burnley friendly will open a few eyes to the standard we are bringing in so far.
-
Take it you didn't sit and watch Adam give away possession over and over. He was horrendous it didn't have anything to do with the manager.
-
they can't take part in a discussion. They should only be a conduit to pass idea from club to member. To be in a discussion you must have a position. They are neither there to have an opinion or pass one.Any spokesman must be seen as opinion less. To take part in a discussion they would first need to have known parameters from their members. The only comment should be we will pass this on to our members and get back to you especially when being made public. What they have done is to give the impression to the club that initial feeling was positive with room to take the idea forward. Until this is learned the majority of the support will continue to mistrust and perceive their actions as being of a personal agenda or opinion pushing.
-
They might be small in number but the harm they have and can cause makes them of concern. Enemies should be met head on
-
Why have the club not canvassed the st holders on this? These groups present have all answered without asking one single members opinion. How do they know their members think its a good idea? Seems like the opinion of those in control not the members. The fans should be asked to decide if we want these groups continuing to state they talk for the fans.Not the people who have something to lose or gain.For me there should be a strong distinction from talking for members from talking for rangers fans. Its like stating you talk for white people because all 2000 ofyour members are white.
-
Summer 2015 - Transfers and Rumours Thread
trublusince1982 replied to der Berliner's topic in Rangers Chat
Would be disgusted if he came back. Will never forget or forgive his actions and press conference. Doesn't deserve to wear the jersey. -
You could be right but are we not meant to be signing players that can challenge for the top title? Just like Aberdeen the level of the market we are shopping in will never be good enough to challenge. You can also switch it and say players like Adam and mccormick who aren't good enough for rangers are stars worth over £10m to lower level English teams Honestly think the squad so far will struggle to win the championship and will not be sufficient to entertain 50000.
-
To late now. They have already answered on behalf of their members without having asked a single one. They went with their personal opinions when answering on behalf of the group as a whole proving 100% they push personal opinion not those of any majority. Not one even mentions needing to take this question to their members before answering. Have the club even approached st holder's on their wishes? Nope. So let's not kid on this is to give voice to supporters. This is to give voice to friends of the current board members. *edit can move this comment to other thread if you want frankie
-
Majority feeling does not need a single voice. a person with a calculator on the receiving end is all that is needed. How many of the groups present at the recent meeting with the board collated their members thoughts before commenting on their behalf on the issue presented? I bet a big fat zero.
-
it why we need a group for any of they things that I cannot understand. Communication is simple in this day an age. There is no need for any group to speak for anyone on those matters. We can all do so for ourselves directly and freely.
-
Why do you think the support need a group? For what purpose?
-
They will never talk for rangers fans only the point of view of a few. Wish the club would do away with all these groups and just put in place the ability for fans to communicate and invest through the club. No need or major want for these groups or committees to exist.
-
Is there need for any group Frankie?