Jump to content

 

 

buster.

  • Posts

    14,405
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    111

Everything posted by buster.

  1. LBG knew where it was going, ie. an insolvency event and weren't going to allow an overdraft to build-up.
  2. Comes down to the bottomline and loyalties, money can cloud reallity, or at least it's public face.
  3. RPB, I'm simply not going to waste my time going down that road. As for no investigation thusfar, in the events leading up to the CW takeover, I believe you are wrong. The use of the term 'conspiracy theory' has been very successful for the authorities. Whether it be to disparage or discourage discourse, it often helps stifle healthy debate.
  4. So I'm not allowed to point to reason or the fact that the authorities that have a lot of the evidence, BDO or Police Scotland haven't pointed in Rab's direction, nor I'd imagine the financial beneficiaries along the way but I need evidence. No, Rab needs evidence but If people want to keep an open mind that is up to them. Note I I tend to be very open minded on what are often disparagingly called 'conspiracy theories'. So my threshold is high and not like some, automatic. An aside The term 'conspiracy theory' was put forward in 1967 by the CIA, as a tool to discredit people and their message/theory, that was considered against the interests of the 'USA'.
  5. The Judas Blogger plays his part in a co-ordinated attack that comes from the 'Easdale block' remit given to Toxic House. Whatever you think of DK, this is Rangers and it's indirect communication strategy. It demonstrates that Spin is greater than Transparency and that Division is in their interests.
  6. He would need to state with some detail what his claim was and given the 'far-fetched' nature of it, then the onus would be on him to provide accompanying evidence.
  7. 5. Is promoting 'division' and little more. Sustained attack on DK over the past 12 hours from Toxic House. Including the Sir Duped article.
  8. To begin with, the evidence that has been investigated by BDO and the Police has pointed elsewhere (or are they Celtic supporters aswell ?). Follow the Money...........
  9. All evidence and reason points elsewhere. The Celtic-Minded 'cabal' are organised and do 'things' , but not this. This served more to deflect from reallity.
  10. Good old German sarcasm,............ doesn't make much sense but you can't beat it !
  11. Are you on the spacecake aswell DB I fail to see what relevance your post has to mine, that you quote above in post#32.
  12. I certainly don't think it the type of reaction you would expect from a potential office bearer that considered the role more important than himself. Nor one that had any vision.
  13. For the avoidance of doubt, can you please list the "clubs enemies" as per your view or opinion.
  14. They hate Rangers but.............IMO you are seriously misguided. Tin Foil Hat Misguided.
  15. Wait a minute So are you saying that this was all a 'cunning plan' devised by a 'cabal', from Reid to Fullerton (Celtic-Minded) to take out or seriously 'wound' their arch-enemy on their quest for World (or SPL) Domination ? Tell me you don't believe anything along those lines, please Rab
  16. Opportunity, as in 'opportunist mechanism'. It's obviously not in Lloyds interests to let the Murray group go down. The 'threat' effectively applied to Rangers although it was made in the knowledge that it extremely unlikely that the IBC would be able to further resist. Asking you same question..... Why do you think LBG were so keen for CW to get Rangers ?
  17. 18M pounds sterling and what might have been coming down the road can't be considered "small beer". The Murray Group numbers were much greater but didn't seem to have such 'opportunities' and hence, you can't compare them in the way you seem to be doing,... apples and carrots. However, by hook or by crook, an opportunity was found at Ibrox and the bank would seem to have benifitted more than most from it's realisation. 'Follow the Money'................
  18. I think you have to go back further and to the alleged threat from the bank (direct or via agent) that they would force insolvency if the CW deal wasn't signed.
  19. Going forward, I think this is a may be a more relevant and productive direction to look in. ie. looking at any info any of us may have or be able to find out about how Ashely/Llambias went about things at Newcastle United, including the thread topic.
  20. I think this is the only conclusion one can reach after reading the 'authoritive posts' from Barca72 that contained such 'significant and relevant research'.
  21. Not only don't you forget what you never knew but now you know something about me that I'm as yet unaware of. Your some machine..............."Vorsprung durch Technik" !! . Perhaps you could enlighten me.
  22. That one line enboldened above shows that you never really knew, what you say you don't forget. There is no simple longterm solution and your lack of respect towards others compounds your dupability.
  23. All three have one thing in common. That they got very well rewarded for their time on the multi-layered gravytrain where everyone are "big Rangers men". Obviously a very different narrative is behind each man and their time at Rangers.
  24. You seem to want to forget the Past and what led to this point when it would be more instructive for you to learn from it, regardless of your age. The past is serial gulibility that for some turns into stupidity when they refuse to learn lessons. The Present is an omnishambles at all levels and that has everything to do with what has gone by and the chancers that many supporters have backed blindly. It is also about police investigations that encompass periods when a substantial part of the current main shareholding block was in the building. The short to medium term Future is dark and it is only to what degree, that is to be determined. Perhaps you should respect supporters who are sick and scunnered of all the dishonesty and greed and have decided not to continue funding a dishonest omnishambles, they want transparency and the present incumbents don't deliver. They tend to respect the decisions of those who still attend.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.