bmck

someone nice enough to answer! thanks man!

where do you get coupons?

yup - you may not be highest on the post count, but if there were a word count.....

calscot's back!

easily the trust. no other organisation has as accurately represented my views and is based on as solid principles.

great post johnny.

mate, they dont have to ok what is written. absolutely no censorship on either side, but the very two-different-voices-spoken-from-one-place of it would give it infinitely more power than either would individually.

i dont think it need be with the club. i think it can be with us. now, remember that generally celtic fans feel villified by the press too (this is the reality of the matter). i think a joint project between celtic and rangers forums to provide informed criticism on the press would be a great idea.

i say we set up a group of people to critically analyse this shit, and set up a GERS alternative news type thing - have a large community of members who will e-mail the editor with the criticisms.

shows how much sway forums have now though.

i dont even understand that sentence.

amen. i was about to post the very same thing. we're bad fans are we? lets show how bad actual badness is. mass civil disorder is the only way people will properly take notice. i say we take jim traynor hostage too.

love architecture. love that building. celebrate modernity!

oh, they're the first british club now, are they?

note the disproportionate amount of coverage on supposed sectarianism versus a fifty man riot in london after the chelsea spurs game.

an even harsher question - is there going to be an effective democratic response? whats going to happen, as i suspect will happen, when the clamps come down even tighter?

shockingly poor argument cammy. i'm suprised. we're all here to debate every aspect of rangers - david murray is a succesful and sought after chairman, should we stop criticisng him? or does success make you immune from criticism? wait - plg, that european class manager, i could have sworn i heard you complaining about our defense... :admin:

mass creative rioting is what this country needs. bloody good on the RST.

agreed. he was outstanding last night. a genuinly class keeper - far, far better than mcgregor.

come on - noone have any sense of optimism?

i also cant believe some people are taking this seriously in the comments. its not meant to be serious surely?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7ag44YYGYI&mode=related&search=

i like reading big fat eck's column (someone persuade him to transfer his blog to gersnet!). he's got a generally different opinion on last night - some comments: the whole article is good, aparts from just these snippets, you can read it here: http://rangers.openfootball.co.uk/index.php/2007/03/09/god-save-brahim-gers-1-osasuna-1/ what do you think, is there a silver lining? (p.s i promise no more topics starting with 'the')

although the tactics - a defensive formation with no match winners and a lone striker who cant hold up the ball - were clearly wrong, i think the harshest reality for me last night was that our players, in general, just aren't cut out for this level of football. this may be harsh, but there was no slick passing and moving - no-one who could take the ball in in a tight area play a pass, and then make space. we were being closed down, but so to were ossasuna, but slick passing got them out and into an attacking position despite us essentially playing five midfielders. i dont think players like adam, murray, boyd will ever reach this level - hutton might get there, burke may, ferguson (our worst player last night?) arguably is - ehigo (?) is past it, weir was decent, and klos was the only player who looked comfortable. super_ally's thread and cammy's posts last week have driven it home just how bad we are. we're like the nine in a row squad with a lower callibre of squad player and none of the match winners.

i dunno man. but the idea of a forum clock cracks me up anyway - i mean, if you need to know the time, just look an extra inch or so \-wards and it'll show you the time on the computer clock.