Gonzo79

I'm not a Union Bear member and don't sit amongst them often. I'm also not very sensitive and have developed a very thick skin over the years.

Hopefully him and Herrera start from now on. Miller did nothing again today.

I think smoke bombs are okay and British society is overly sensitive.

That was a smoke bomb, not a flare.

Starting with Miller will cost PC his job.

I think that's the intention, Rab. Well, to be involved WITH the board, not as a hindrance.

The aim of Club1872 is very simple, Bill and you have stated it twice in your post there.

I know. I had a lot going on and cancelled quite a lot of things that week - long story.

Fascinating.

Any Bears who have a go at Club1872 obviously don't trust their fellow Bears with involvement in the boardroom. Understandable in some respects. They seem to want a sugar daddy...ain't gonna happen. I packed in my membership after the 5-1 game because I was bloody annoyed. I may return but I think things have to look better before doing so. But Bears having a bigger say in how the club is run is a very good thing in my view and I'm glad I've contributed.

As soon as I see Tom English or Chris McLaughlin mentioned, I know exactly what agenda is being adhered to and thus ignore. Pair of despicable, speccy, smug and embarrassing 'journalists'.

Barjonas looks a class player - I have high hopes for him. As an aside, I hate Feyenoord.

I'm in my late 30s and still prefer to stand, wherever possible. I appreciate that others prefer to sit and then you have to consider disabled supporters but I don't see why anyone would object to a safe standing area for 3-6,000.

So everyone has to sit down? Younger people will much prefer standing with their mates and having a sing song, which means we get the next generation involved. If 10,000 Bears are against safe standing, good for them. They can stay quiet in their seats somewhere else and let a few thousand stand. We must have the grumpiest support in world football.

To be fair, there are obviously rumours amongst the staff at Rangers which fans get wind of. Sometimes the club might be looking at someone and it doesn't go through - that's just football. Some people take it far too seriously. Wait until it's official before getting excited.

I do. And it can't get much worse. As much as I hate to say it, the atmosphere at the Piggery is better than Ibrox and the standing area there is definitely a contributory factor. The football should be a good day out and I've had far better days whilst on terraces.

Anyone who bets on us to win the league this season is throwing money away. Sadly, the vermin have by far the best team in the league and will drop hardly any points (we've already dropped 4 in three matches).

I really like the smell of smoke bombs and think they look good. Flares look good too but I can see why there are concerns about them. I really hope the safe standing gets the go ahead as Ibrox is a library for most matches.

That's exactly how I see it. A silly thing for PC to come out with publicly, as now potential buyers know we don't value MOH.

South Park's portrayal of Mel Gibson was more accurate than Braveheart's portrayal of William Wallace.

I'm trying not to assume too much but trying to give Pedro and Pena the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he's just on the bench to get him accustomed to a new environment?

Hot and sticky?

I'm sure he's still at the club. It's a shame if he doesn't get any more chances with the first team. I saw us play at Gala Fairydean Rovers a month or so ago and was very impressed with Barjonas (sp?). He looks a cracking prospect and seemed to do okay when he got a chance but he too seems to have fallen off the radar.

I never had McKay down as a wide player. Always thought he'd be more effective behind the strikers - as he didn't go past people enough to be a great winger.

Aye I understand. Not sure how anyone would react in such awful circumstances and absolutely no criticism or offence intended in my post.