plgsarmy

I’m famous

Craig, the RST raised £250k in under a week in 2012 because people knew it was going directly to the Club so it’s achievable.

What I don’t understand is that we were told at the AGM that there would be a full consultation exercise before any plans were made to implement this. Is this survey in addition to that?

I honestly don’t know why this is being done by Club 1872 and the Union Bears. This should be coming from the Club and all ST holders consulted IMHO.

I’m feeling exactly the same. Feet up in a lovely warm house and no getting stuck in traffic both before and after the game. I feel guilty though.

I was just being pedantic. I think it should say they were appointed.

It’s wrong to say they were elected, they weren’t.

Brilliant news Iain.

Doesn’t your final sentence totally contradict what you said earlier? Many of us have our own shares but also choose to put monthly donations into a collective fans’ shareholding.

So because a bunch of anonymous people say they contacted the regulator and made Club 1872 backtrack you believe them?

I’m not sure what you’re talking about, Are you? The wording of the new articles is exactly the same as it was for RF. As for your CG edict nonsense, grow up.

It may have been if five different family members all claimed the membership

I know what the word inherit means. My point was that unless it was written into a will or a person was nominated, how would Club 1872 know who is to be given the life membership? The regulator, as far as I know, was asked to look over the draft articles and give the go ahead. She hasn’t done so due to complaints from the usual suspects.

Quite honestly, I don’t recall it ever being discussed.

What happened with RF was nothing to do with me. I was not a member as you probably know.

B, I think you’re letting your hatred of JB get in the way here. Unless you nominated the person you wanted to inherit when you bought it, how could Club 1872 ever decide who was to inherit it if the owner had multiple heirs?

It’s clear to me that they are a small bunch who failed to get elected and didn’t want Club 1872 to have any success unless they were in control.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Indeed there was. Did you like my blue wig?

But, but, but that's St Paddy's day. Surely that can't be right.

http://club1872.co.uk/news/club-1872-inaugural-dinner/ Any interest in this? If we can get ten people before 12th August we can get it for £45 a head. PM me if interested.

Got your text. I voted for the Dundee game but could make all three.

It's about time this was utilised to become a money maker.

Those of us who believe that shares are the most important aspect are in a minority amongst the Rangers support. Bear in mind that, at our lowest point in recent years, we only managed to attract circa 14,000 fans into fan share buying schemes. The reasoning behind the projects was to try to attract new members who were not previously interested in share ownership. There could be lots of things that people could say the Board should be doing but their main priority is getting the team right and maintaining the stadium. The projects can fund things that wouldn't be getting done by the club in the short term or things that would enhance the fans' experience.

Great news