Tumshie RFC 0 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 You wouldn't think so. But who knows with this farce? God help us if we have guys like the Easdale's having a real influence in the boardroom over the coming years. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 If Ahmad & Green are selling up and getting out of dodge, then that might explain why McColl didn't put Easdale on the list of directors to be removed from the board. McColl will hope to get Easdale's support ahead of the EGM or perhaps already has it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefanovitch 0 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 If Ahmad & Green are selling up and getting out of dodge, then that might explain why McColl didn't put Easdale on the list of directors to be removed from the board. McColl will hope to get Easdale's support ahead of the EGM or perhaps already has it. I had thought along the same lines. If McColl wanted Easdale out surely he would have named them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54andcounting 0 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 Does that mean Easdale is really a good guy then? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,346 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 I wouldn't read too much into the fact that Easdale wasn't named He hasn't been around long enough to have taken part in any of the bad decisions and therefore won't have appeared on McColl's radar. I doubt McColl has any favourable views of Easdale, but you do things one step at a time. As for Easdale buying shares, expect this to be a regular occurance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 We've previously seen Easdales PR adviser briefing the press that the brothers owned over 6% which surprise, surprise was utter bullshit meant to deceive us into believing that they were far more important players in this game than the reality demonstrates. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 my guess is ahmed wont get the money until the easdales sell them on. an attempt at propping up the price. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 If the Easdales put cash up fair play to them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted August 15, 2013 Share Posted August 15, 2013 cash up to who? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted August 15, 2013 Author Share Posted August 15, 2013 my guess is ahmed wont get the money until the easdales sell them on. an attempt at propping up the price. I thought that, then I thought surely your not allowed to prop up a price this way. Am I a bit naive ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.