the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Whyte held 85% of the shareholding so some way or another he needed dealt with and what a deal it was. assets transfered to whytes company and the fans paying the cva. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 £250k it's a hell of a lot more than green whyte zeus hughes or ahemd thats for sure. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Whyte's shareholding was only relevant in the instance that the CVA proposal had been accepted. Funny how we haven't heard from Greenco how that would have worked out. Somehow I don't think 'duping' Whyte in that event would have been as easy as they'd like us to think. their was no intention to dupe whyte if we got a cva. the company (rangers) was loaning whyte the money green was getting a huge cut and a job and we were paying for it all. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Except Whyte never had anything proper in writing 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted September 8, 2013 Author Share Posted September 8, 2013 it's a hell of a lot more than green whyte zeus hughes or ahemd thats for sure. Except they were able to get proper money on the table and buy us. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Except they were able to get proper money on the table and buy us. they were indeed. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Except Whyte never had anything proper in writing he got enough in writing that he is currently a director of sevco 5088 and green tried and failed to remove him as one. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 he got enough in writing that he is currently a director of sevco 5088 and green tried and failed to remove him as one. and of course someone like Whyte would never produce a forgery would he? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,246 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 he got enough in writing that he is currently a director of sevco 5088 and green tried and failed to remove him as one. Has anyone any source that Sevco 5088 has anything to do or owns anything of Rangers FC and/or Sevco Scotland/Rangers Football Club International plc right now? Going by public knowledge (AFAIK) that is not the case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 and of course someone like Whyte would never produce a forgery would he? Companies house don't accept forgeries. But they did at least remove whyte as a durector while the checked before puting him back on it seems. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.