the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Has anyone any source that Sevco 5088 has anything to do or owns anything of Rangers FC and/or Sevco Scotland/Rangers Football Club International plc right now? Going by public knowledge (AFAIK) that is not the case. The dont own anything. But bear in mind we are talking about greens cva deal here . 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 The dont own anything. But bear in mind we are talking about greens cva deal here . when the CVA got rejected Whyte was irrelevent to the whole process. Even if Whyte was a SEVCO5088 director it never got the assets. Sevco Scotland got them. Was Whyte a director of SEVCO Scotland ? NO 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 yes when it was rejected not before. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 Has anyone any source that Sevco 5088 has anything to do or owns anything of Rangers FC and/or Sevco Scotland/Rangers Football Club International plc right now? Going by public knowledge (AFAIK) that is not the case. D&P's binding agreement for the CVA/asset purchase was with Sevco 5088 Ltd and no other company. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 when the CVA got rejected Whyte was irrelevent to the whole process. Even if Whyte was a SEVCO5088 director it never got the assets. Sevco Scotland got them. Was Whyte a director of SEVCO Scotland ? NO The problem is that the right to purchase the assets lay with Sevco 5088 Ltd not Sevco Scotland Ltd, Green has as yet been unable to prove that he legally novated that right from Sevco 5088 Ltd to Sevco Scotland Ltd. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simplythebest 0 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 The problem is that the right to purchase the assets lay with Sevco 5088 Ltd not Sevco Scotland Ltd, Green has as yet been unable to prove that he legally novated that right from Sevco 5088 Ltd to Sevco Scotland Ltd. How is Whyte's legal action coming along? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 How is Whyte's legal action coming along? How are Green's attempts to dissolve Sevco 5088 Ltd coming along? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 How is Whyte's legal action coming along? It isn't. The man's a deluded Walter Mitty 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 as we discovered from charlotte recently. green claims to have had verbal agreement from the directors of sevco5088 for sevco scotland to buy the assets instead. what was that about not having things in writing again. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UCF2008 0 Posted September 8, 2013 Share Posted September 8, 2013 their was no intention to dupe whyte if we got a cva. the company (rangers) was loaning whyte the money green was getting a huge cut and a job and we were paying for it all. Personally, I don't believe for a second that there was any intention to dupe Whyte. I was merely pointing out that Green's version of events make no sense whether he thought a CVA was possible or not. Like I said, Whyte's shareholding was completely irrelevant without a CVA. There was no need to talk to him nevermind dupe him. Green claims that Whyte's recorded evidence is just them telling Whyte whatever he wanted to hear to get the shares. What he still hasn't shared with us is how that was supposed to work or even the content of the sheet of paper he was waving around claiming to be a written agreement for the shareholding back in May last year. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.