Bluedell 5,329 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Irrelevant if it was succeeded by a permanent contract; as you have already said 12 months notice is normal for a CEO at this level. Unless he was caught with his hand in the till, I don't see that sacking him as BD suggests was a realistic option. The point about the interim appointment was just to highlight the gravy train mentality prevalent in the board. Mather confirmed that the board had subsequently gone through a selection process and decided he was the best candidate. If they had found someone better then presumably he would have got a £600K pay-off. As for the argument that he was also COO, we appear to have managed without a separate one since his permanent appointment. The whole thing stinks. Green was sacked for gross misconduct but still got a full pay-out so there is every reason to think that Mather would have got the same, no matter his offence. We don't know why he was sacked but this board have been proven to give each other cash rather than looking to save the company money. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
j1mgg 0 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 both sides? there is only one side rangers side There is not just one side and that is pretty clear even from just in here Pro PM Pro board Anti PM Anti board Don't want any of the buggers Then there is people that just want to go and watch the football. Everyone wants what they think is best for rangers, just that different people have different opinions on what they think that is. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,149 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 Everyone wants what they think is best for rangers, just that different people have different opinions on what they think that is. Well said! It's a real shame that a few people have forgotten about this in their haste to moan about each other via the daily divisive nonsense we see on some forums. We just need to keep it simple. There are clear issues with the board of the club - that much is obvious from the bonus culture, the poor financial results, the dreadful PR function and the lack of overall clarity. No need to go after person A or B - just make the point for improvement until we get it. That's why an open AGM was so necessary and I'd have thought even PM's biggest critics would appreciate that as it gives them a chance to keep him out. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted October 18, 2013 Share Posted October 18, 2013 As I say one side. Rangers. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.