RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 BPH only hold a small percentage shareholding do they not ? They've shown no inclination to increase that shareholding . Is this KEef Jackson trying to create a story where none exists 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 its bph trying to get 50p a share from king via threats. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 its bph trying to get 50p a share from king via threats. And how do you work that one out? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 patently obvious. last week it was green coming back, yesterday some aussie taking control now some lawyer who isn't even bph trying to flush out king. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 patently obvious. last week it was green coming back, yesterday some aussie taking control now some lawyer who isn't even bph trying to flush out king. And why would they do that? DK has absolutely no intention of becoming involved financially. That is blatantly obvious to me 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Sp.iv spinners hand story to Jackson who gets an apparent exclusive and sells print. Not having read the article, I can't comment on contents but headline and info available tends to suggest that there is no real 'tangible big new story' or revelations. Think about the timing and current circumstances. Think about Green last week. Think about Deloittes and going concern status. Think about share issues. Think about ST sales. Think about Auchenhowie. Think about Dave King. I have no info but it would seem as 'ducks are being lined up' for something and/or to push others. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 And why would they do that? DK has absolutely no intention of becoming involved financially. That is blatantly obvious to me hes certainly not going to make ****s rich. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Jack's back! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stimpy 0 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 patently obvious. last week it was green coming back, yesterday some aussie taking control now some lawyer who isn't even bph trying to flush out king. Plain as the nose on your face. Some still fall for it, after everything that's happened, they still fall for it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,254 Posted June 24, 2014 Share Posted June 24, 2014 To me this yet another non storey from the Daily Rhebel not worthy of discussion 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.