RANGERRAB 3,299 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Gunslinger essentially said the same as Hildy yesterday and I asked him how this can be done business-wise. There have been quite many calls for heads and boards and whatnot for months. When you ask people how this will come about - boycot or not - the answers become ever more vague. Shareprice at a low will get those in power to act - if they are looking after their money right now. I doubt that many do though. At the end of the day, unless someone with the money at the ready buys up shares galore or backs the club (somehow) openly - be it Ashley or King - and thus also gives stockmarket'ters the idea that we are doing well from then on, there won't be any changes before an AGM. And if that happens, who is to say that whoever gets elected is someone with real "power"? As in: all this talk about "regime change" is fine and well. If there is no mechanism and actual possibility to do it right now, going on about it as the only way forward is pretty fruitless. the idea some seem to have that they can force change in a company they don't own is ridiculous in the extreme.Changes will be forthcoming no doubt about it. Time is up for this board unless they attract investment(as they said they would) and very quickly. By all means don't attend matches (or 'starve them out' as it's put on here) if that's how you feel but it will only be Rangers who suffer and the damage may be long lasting or permanent. I don't want that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 changing regime is not easy is it? It's not, particularly when many have no inclination to actually change it. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,058 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Small sales at 17p and 18p, dreadful. Still to reach the nadir I'd guess and a discounted rights issue on the horizon to boot. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hildy 0 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 the idea some seem to have that they can force change in a company they don't own is ridiculous in the extreme.Changes will be forthcoming no doubt about it. Time is up for this board unless they attract investment(as they said they would) and very quickly.By all means don't attend matches (or 'starve them out' as it's put on here) if that's how you feel but it will only be Rangers who suffer and the damage may be long lasting or permanent. I don't want that. I want us to buy them out. It can only happen though if people want them bought out and if they are prepared to chip in to make it happen. As long as the Rangers support is a minority shareholder, it has little hope of having the club that it wants. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 If your a shareholder. NO, dreadful for the Club. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Still to reach the nadir I'd guess and a discounted rights issue on the horizon to boot. I agree. I suggested 10p-12.5p earlier in the thread. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 Gunslinger essentially said the same as Hildy yesterday and I asked him how this can be done business-wise. There have been quite many calls for heads and boards and whatnot for months. When you ask people how this will come about - boycot or not - the answers become ever more vague. Shareprice at a low will get those in power to act - if they are looking after their money right now. I doubt that many do though. At the end of the day, unless someone with the money at the ready buys up shares galore or backs the club (somehow) openly - be it Ashley or King - and thus also gives stockmarket'ters the idea that we are doing well from then on, there won't be any changes before an AGM. And if that happens, who is to say that whoever gets elected is someone with real "power"? As in: all this talk about "regime change" is fine and well. If there is no mechanism and actual possibility to do it right now, going on about it as the only way forward is pretty fruitless. Call an EGM and change the regime in 4 weeks. Get the ****s to resign and do it in 4 days. It's dead easy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 NO, dreadful for the Club. I bet many shareholders wish they could change their AGM votes now. But your right this board have been dreadful for club and shareholders. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 NO, dreadful for the Club. The price taking a hammering just now will only be dreadful for the Club longer term if the current regime (the people REALLY in control) use it to their own advantage and tighten their stranglehold on the Club or if another bunch of shysters who don't genuinely care about Rangers get control. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted September 17, 2014 Share Posted September 17, 2014 NO, dreadful for the Club. Should replacing the board be a priority ?.............as they are obviously the main problem. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.