Share movement

[forlanssister 3,061]

How much of Celtic does Desmond own?

 

It's well over 30% of the voting rights, iirc it's voting rights that count not actual % ownership of the company as different classes of shares have different rights etc.

 

They're three companies remember. Shellik plc, Shellik fc ltd & the Shellik football and athletic company ltd.

 

Only one is listed though.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

getting cheaper by the day.

[BrahimHemdani 1]

getting cheaper by the day.

 

Small sales at 17p and 18p, dreadful.

Edited September 17, 2014 by BrahimHemdani
p

[RANGERRAB 3,307]

Under these circumstances in any normal company you'd expect there to be major boardroom changes.

If the various fans groups used this share price collapse as ammunition instead of the usual time-worn allegations we might get somewhere.

[Hildy 0]

Under these circumstances in any normal company you'd expect there to be major boardroom changes.

If the various fans groups used this share price collapse as ammunition instead of the usual time-worn allegations we might get somewhere.

Boardroom change at Ibrox is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

 

It's regime change that is required.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Under these circumstances in any normal company you'd expect there to be major boardroom changes.

If the various fans groups used this share price collapse as ammunition instead of the usual time-worn allegations we might get somewhere.

 

Shareholders can change the boardroom any time they please.

[the gunslinger 3,366]

Small sales at 17p and 18p, dreadful.

 

If your a shareholder.

[RANGERRAB 3,307]

Boardroom change at Ibrox is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

 

It's regime change that is required.

 

changing regime is not easy is it?

[Frankie 8,186]

Under these circumstances in any normal company you'd expect there to be major boardroom changes.

If the various fans groups used this share price collapse as ammunition instead of the usual time-worn allegations we might get somewhere.

 

There were major boardroom changes around the time of last year's AGM.

 

They were ineffectual because they're clearly not running the club.

[der Berliner 3,292]

changing regime is not easy is it?

 

Gunslinger essentially said the same as Hildy yesterday and I asked him how this can be done business-wise. There have been quite many calls for heads and boards and whatnot for months. When you ask people how this will come about - boycot or not - the answers become ever more vague.

Shareprice at a low will get those in power to act - if they are looking after their money right now. I doubt that many do though. At the end of the day, unless someone with the money at the ready buys up shares galore or backs the club (somehow) openly - be it Ashley or King - and thus also gives stockmarket'ters the idea that we are doing well from then on, there won't be any changes before an AGM. And if that happens, who is to say that whoever gets elected is someone with real "power"?

 

As in: all this talk about "regime change" is fine and well. If there is no mechanism and actual possibility to do it right now, going on about it as the only way forward is pretty fruitless.