Rangersitis 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I've said several times that Chuck wanted them in from the start (IPO) as he has previous business dealings with them involving Rizvi companies and he has a friend who is or was on their board. They are at the low end of the scale regards NOMADS and ethics. Yup, a match made in Heaven. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 So at the end of the day, Rangers will have to announce some other Nomad and that will be that. Much like any other company that have them as Nomads. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 So at the end of the day, Rangers will have to announce some other Nomad and that will be that. Much like any other company that have them as Nomads. and that will be what? the 4th change in as many years? all completely normal isn't it? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,816 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 So at the end of the day, Rangers will have to announce some other Nomad and that will be that. Much like any other company that have them as Nomads. You don't appreciate the situation fully. If required, the appointment of a new NOMAD could change the game a little. Deloittes might like a reputable NOMAD. A reputable NOMAD might not stand for X, Y and Z. etc., etc. In the air........ 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 and that will be what? the 4th change in as many years? all completely normal isn't it? Of course it is.....just like everything else at Rangers according to our man from Barlinnie. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveC 150 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Of course it is.....just like everything else at Rangers according to our man from Barlinnie. From Berlin, you mean? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 and that will be what? the 4th change in as many years? all completely normal isn't it? In fact, I wasn't commenting on the lamentable state of affairs, but what is going probably going to happen. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 From Berlin, you mean? Don't drop to this chaps standards. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,816 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 In fact, I wasn't commenting on the lamentable state of affairs, but what is going probably going to happen. Given your history, perhaps you should qualify that with a bright red warning tag ....."as forseen by DB" :seal: 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,816 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 From Martin Williams at The Herald The move came as one of Rangers' four biggest shareholders sold nearly all its shares in the club's operating company. It is understood London-based investment managers Hargreave Hale dumped 4.27m of its 4.42m Rangers International Football Club plc shares at 20p each, recouping £853,000. http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/home-news/whyte-barred-as-director-after-shocking-and-reprehensible-behaviour.25471828 Surely there is a requirement to inform the market as to this transaction. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.