RANGERRAB 3,307 Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 The amount of shite we have been subjected to by Whyte, Green et al and your main concern relates to a cheap jibe by a two-bit hack. This type of idiocy when it comes to priorities has been a major factor in allowing those who have systematically bled the club dry to do so relatively unhindered. The fact is pondlife like Grahame know they spout these lies and get away with it. He is back to peddling this nonsense Rangers are a new club with no history. His hatred is there for all to see. Mind you he's not the worst. I'd award that to fellow pond life Gibbons. Say what you like about Liewell but Grahame would never set foot in the San Giro again if it was them. With all due respect I think we are dealing with separate issues here regards Whyte,Green etc and the pond life pseudo journos who inhabit this country of ours 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 The fact is pondlife like Grahame know they spout these lies and get away with it. He is back to peddling this nonsense Rangers are a new club with no history. His hatred is there for all to see. Mind you he's not the worst. I'd award that to fellow pond life Gibbons.Say what you like about Liewell but Grahame would never set foot in the San Giro again if it was them. With all due respect I think we are dealing with separate issues here regards Whyte,Green etc and the pond life pseudo journos who inhabit this country of ours He didn’t mention history, and on that basis he is spot on in what he says. The Rangers of today is most definitely not the club that I grew up supporting, and none of that is down to Grahame, Gibbons or whoever else in the press pack that you want to name. While the brave soldiers within our support were so hung up on pedantry and screaming 'in the eyes of the law' over each and every media story, the real bad guys were loading up their getaway cars with their ill-gotten gains. It seems that nothing has changed, and that is fucking tragic. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,307 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 He didn’t mention history, and on that basis he is spot on in what he says. The Rangers of today is most definitely not the club that I grew up supporting, and none of that is down to Grahame, Gibbons or whoever else in the press pack that you want to name. While the brave soldiers within our support were so hung up on pedantry and screaming 'in the eyes of the law' over each and every media story, the real bad guys were loading up their getaway cars with their ill-gotten gains. It seems that nothing has changed, and that is fucking tragic. When Grahame starts calling Rangers a new club I know exactly what he is inferring. You might not but I do. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 When Grahame starts calling Rangers a new club I know exactly what he is inferring. You might not but I do. Your reading of the on-going situation has been well documented. I shall leave it at that. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Your reading of the on-going situation has been well documented. I shall leave it at that. So you like and accept it when him and others of his ilk call us a new club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I take it that 2 hours on we are none the wiser about this share dealings? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,186 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I take it that 2 hours on we are none the wiser about this share dealings? Herald suggest Hargreave Hale did indeed sell the shares. No indication of who to. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,299 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Herald suggest Hargreave Hale did indeed sell the shares. No indication of who to. Hm, that would be 7-8% and a statement to the stockmarket would be due. Everyone strapped in? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 So you like and accept it when him and others of his ilk call us a new club? Where did I state anything of the sort? You stick to your uber-staunch stance on everything Rangers. Me, I have nothing to prove to anyone, and will call things as I see them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,812 Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Where did I state anything of the sort? You stick to your uber-staunch stance on everything Rangers. Me, I have nothing to prove to anyone, and will call things as I see them. The uber-staunch stance on everything Rangers is flawed and has been exploited by sp.ivs and their advisors. DB is a good example (but one of many) regards his support for those who fill their suitcases with loot aslong as they wear the club tie and say the right things. Collective objective thought is, or rather would have been sp.iv kryptonite. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.