RANGERRAB 3,256 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 if no one bought a single share at the share issue except dave king he would have bought 25% for 4 million and would have no control what so ever. He'd by the biggest single shareholder by far. The board would be incredibly stupid to ignore him were that the case. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 He'd by the biggest single shareholder by far. The board would be incredibly stupid to ignore him were that the case. easdale controls 29%. and the notion that no one at all will buy is daft. but really the board would be devious not stupid in ignoring him. much as they have been all along. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
forlanssister 3,050 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 easdale controls 29%. and the notion that no one at all will buy is daft. but really the board would be devious not stupid in ignoring him. much as they have been all along. The 29% Easdale controls is part of a larger block, they claim just under the 30% to avoid being labelled a concert party. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zappa 0 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 easdale controls 29%. He's the menacing face/front of almost 27%, but I doubt very much if he even controls his own personal shareholding of under 5% because it's a family interest at best. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrahimHemdani 1 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 Aye but try it when there's a blocking stake of 51% in place with no intention of selling or releasing control. Don't be so sure of that now. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted September 2, 2014 Share Posted September 2, 2014 He's the menacing face/front of almost 27%, but I doubt very much if he even controls his own personal shareholding of under 5% because it's a family interest at best. that's right. Easdales control fuck all 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Another 500,000 shares transferred today. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Another 500,000 shares transferred today. .........and then transferred back or somewhere else, 5 seconds later ?? 1. 09-Sep...........Time-..08:43:54secs............500,000 shares..........@25p 2. 09-Sep............Time-..08:43:59secs............500,000 shares..........@25p 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangersitis 0 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 .........and then transferred back or somewhere else, 5 seconds later ?? 1. 09-Sep...........Time-..08:43:54secs............500,000 shares..........@25p 2. 09-Sep............Time-..08:43:59secs............500,000 shares..........@25p Yes, that's what I meant by transferred. A similar type of transaction as a couple of weeks ago with the 1.8m. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buster. 4,808 Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Yes, that's what I meant by transferred. A similar type of transaction as a couple of weeks ago with the 1.8m. Was there a definitive or 'most plausible guess' as to what the trades meant ? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.