RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 should we waive the fee and take a Dundee Hibs player if they cant afford the fee? who would we take? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 should we waive the fee and take a Dundee Hibs player if they cant afford the fee? who would we take? i hear charlie telfer is good. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve1872 4 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Tyrone Smith @TyroneSTV 4m4 minutes ago Here's Dundee United's response to today's Telfer verdict - strong stuff indeed http://dufc.co/news/choose-clubs-carefully/ … 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTP 0 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Tyrone Smith @TyroneSTV 4m4 minutes agoHere's Dundee United's response to today's Telfer verdict - strong stuff indeed http://dufc.co/news/choose-clubs-carefully/ … Oh Boo Hoo - dry your eyes Thompson. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,833 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Apparently, Stephen Thompson is in a state of seethe. A Solicitor friend in Dundee suggested that Jum Spence(the former Law lecturer) advised Thompson to plough the two year existence furrow. Sad really, as Zappa says, such potential for a paltry sum. The Satsumas will sell Telfer for several times that amount, in 18 months. Wee Jum Spence will once again have to sit naked, on Thompson's lap and feed him peeled grapes. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
26th of foot 5,833 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Having read the Dundee United statement, my ghast is truly flabbered. Interesting, they band on about young players' mobility and choosing club contracts carefully. This millennium, Dundee United were still insisting 16 year olds sign NINE year contracts. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elfideldo 406 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Not sure how they came to the 34k per season figure as the rules are pretty clear. This now means that anyone thinking of following a similar route may not have any club willing to take the chance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 As a general statement, it actually makes some sense.....however, it simply doesn't apply to the current circumstances. Whether Telfer was getting a 1st team game at Rangers is immaterial, the panel felt that we were due compensation for the time & effort that was put into developing the player to where he is now - ready to waltz into the DUFC 1st team. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Cooper 0 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 Get it up them. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted December 9, 2014 Share Posted December 9, 2014 As a general statement, it actually makes some sense.....however, it simply doesn't apply to the current circumstances. Whether Telfer was getting a 1st team game at Rangers is immaterial, the panel felt that we were due compensation for the time & effort that was put into developing the player to where he is now - ready to waltz into the DUFC 1st team. the reason utd pushed this so hard is a great many of our other players want to leave and the cheaper the better for them 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.