Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 People have given the impression a few times the Easdales enjoy being able to sit in the directors box and host guests etc, so maybe not the case for them all. And still you argue in their favour. Astonishing! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I have emailed the Met in London expressing my concerns over health and safety relating to the selected venue. In particular I have requested that they examine the Risk Assessment carried out by Shackleton et al before deciding on this venue. Is there a risk that this sort of thing could backfire and give them an excuse to delay the EGM? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trublusince1982 243 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Is there a risk that this sort of thing could backfire and give them an excuse to delay the EGM? That's my worry, any excuse for a delay. Due to circumstances out with the boards control yadda yadda 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laudbertz 0 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 If they try that, id expect DK to state that there is a 50k seater in Glasgow that is more than capable of handling the crowds. They would surely have to give an extremely good reason as to why it is not being held closer to home in the first place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Is there a risk that this sort of thing could backfire and give them an excuse to delay the EGM? I doubt it. it would be breaking rules and there are plenty of other suitable venues to be found within a 4 week period. After all if you are to believe them they found this venue within a few hours. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I have emailed the Met in London expressing my concerns over health and safety relating to the selected venue. In particular I have requested that they examine the Risk Assessment carried out by Shackleton et al before deciding on this venue. Very sensible. Where ever this is held thousands of angry bears will attend. A strong police presence will be needed. I suspe t the met will tm them not in our borough. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I doubt it. it would be breaking rules and there are plenty of other suitable venues to be found within a 4 week period. After all if you are to believe them they found this venue within a few hours. I think that they have to give a 4 week notice of where and when it's to be held. If they rearrange it then it's possible they change the date. If more than the capacity turn up then it could be declared null and void as not all shareholders would be able to vote. We don't need to be there. We just need to have our votes cast. There won't be an option for questions to be asked from the floor. There's a danger we're all getting carried away. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
govan_derriere 3 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I have concerns about what our current board will do in any situation. I believe that for far too long they have had an easy ride. For as long as they remain, every decision that they make needs to be challenged. As Neville Chamberlain discovered in Munich, appeasement does not work. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,234 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I have emailed the Met in London expressing my concerns over health and safety relating to the selected venue. In particular I have requested that they examine the Risk Assessment carried out by Shackleton et al before deciding on this venue. Could an "unexepected change of venue" mean that the EGM can be "legally" postponed though? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 I have concerns about what our current board will do in any situation. I believe that for far too long they have had an easy ride. For as long as they remain, every decision that they make needs to be challenged. As Neville Chamberlain discovered in Munich, appeasement does not work. Dong what they want us to do doesn't work either. Ashley's proved he's not stupid. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.