Jump to content

 

 

Recommended Posts

Could this be what the Rangers board wanted all along?

DL made my blood boil with the stuff I was reading, also, I dont really know much of BL, but it seems wholly unprofessional to say what he said and ask for it not to be minuted. The RFB are Rangers fans who gave the board a vote of no confidence, there was always going to be a strong chance they would minute absolutely everything that was said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that the RFB should allow themselves to be sacked. You were elected by the fans and should continue to serve. Keep the FB open and continue to criticise and continue to call for meetings where appropriate.

 

I don't think that they should preempt it either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think that the RFB should allow themselves to be sacked. You were elected by the fans and should continue to serve. Keep the FB open and continue to criticise and continue to call for meetings where appropriate.

 

I don't think that they should preempt it either.

 

That's what makes me think they had it planned. Not sure on breaking any agreements which could have some blow back on them if they were to continue without the Rangers boards permission, but even if they are banned from holding meetings in Ibrox, there are plenty other establishments which im sure will be more than happy to help them continue to have their voice heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Safe to say some owe the Fans Board an apology

 

Who owes who what?

 

Perhaps if any apologies are to be given out, those who have constantly criticised, insulted and abused those bears who've exposed the chancers in control of our club a whole lot longer than the RFB, may wish to re-examine their contribution as well? Especially those bears who've continually backed various regimes and directors in the face of overwhelming incompetency.

 

Or perhaps, even better, we move on beyond 'we told you so' playground politics and ensured we take our club back from said chancers.

Edited by Frankie
Link to post
Share on other sites

As for this latest bizarre episode in this farce, well, good on the RFB for sticking to their guns in the face of unfair pressure from club directors.

 

If they weren't already then the positions of Llambias and Leach are certainly untenable now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I respect them for this, because it was unexpected.

 

I'm not overly surprised to be honest. The RFB project may have been flawed from the outset but the model did allow us to raise the issues we wanted. Yes, we were reliant on those on the board doing so and while I don't know many of the reps, I was confident enough that they'd do their jobs accordingly. As long as we did ours...

 

In that respect in many ways the likes of Llambias were a hostage to fortune.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.