MoodyBlue 0 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 And I still ask - why are our players not in doing double training sessions ? Do they not feel they need to improve their 'talents' and fitness levls ????? Hearts have done ok by doing this and clearly wanted promotion more than us and were prepared to work hard for it. Auchenhowie is wasted on this bunch !!! 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darthter 542 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 And I still ask - why are our players not in doing double training sessions ? Do they not feel they need to improve their 'talents' and fitness levls ????? I was looking through the latest batch of training photos from Willie Vass, and started thinking..... All the players look well & truly wrapped up - hats, neck warmers, long johns, gloves etc. Surely if they were being worked hard, they wouldn't need that stuff to keep them warm??? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoodyBlue 0 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 I was looking through the latest batch of training photos from Willie Vass, and started thinking..... All the players look well & truly wrapped up - hats, neck warmers, long johns, gloves etc. Surely if they were being worked hard, they wouldn't need that stuff to keep them warm??? Agreed mate. They are clearly not being worked hard and never have been. It shows every time they step on the pitch on a matchday. The standards that Ally and Kenny have let the footballing side of things drop to are absolutely unforgiveable. Get them in doing double training - get them fitter and get them to work on their skills. It's only since Vuckic has arrived have we had anyone who can deliver a set piece properly, for example. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jhunter 0 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 [ATTACH=CONFIG]548[/ATTACH]Seeing as the data is in my quickie spreadsheet, here's the graph for the percentage win rate for all games this season starting at the 10th game. spreadsheets and graphs now Mcoist was a bad manager, mcdowell is worse , you're looking for controversy where there isn't any. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 He should do a graph to show McCoist's cup performance. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 He should do a graph to show McCoist's cup performance. You could do one yourself. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted March 9, 2015 Share Posted March 9, 2015 For interest (well mine anyway), thought I'd add a few more teams as it's pretty easy. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
calscot 0 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 spreadsheets and graphs now Mcoist was a bad manager, mcdowell is worse , you're looking for controversy where there isn't any. You seem and your strange friend seemed to have missed the point several times despite much repetition. It's not about McCoist as a manger, it's about whether we have a team that has the potential for promotion. I can see why you don't like graphs and spreadsheets - they produce a more objective picture. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Barristan Selmy 222 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) You seem and your strange friend seemed to have missed the point several times despite much repetition. It's not about McCoist as a manger, it's about whether we have a team that has the potential for promotion. I can see why you don't like graphs and spreadsheets - they produce a more objective picture. I have said this plenty times, it doesn't really require silly graphs or irrelevant comparisons between McCoist and KMD. http://www.gersnetonline.co.uk/vb/showthread.php?69014-FT-Cowdenbeath-0-0-Rangers&p=554813&viewfull=1#post554813 Getting promoted should certainly be achievable, just not with McCoist. Edited March 10, 2015 by Ser Barristan Selmy 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
der Berliner 3,240 Posted March 10, 2015 Share Posted March 10, 2015 (edited) spreadsheets and graphs now Mcoist was a bad manager, mcdowell is worse , you're looking for controversy where there isn't any. Well, a useful debate is based on personal opinion and actual facts. I have seen people going ballistic about Walter's tactics and team selections time and again, for years. At the end of the day though, he's been one of the most successful managers in Rangers history. If people start debating his "abilities as a manager" now, they'll get a compassionate glance and a consoling tap on the back. Both McCoist's and McDowall's stats and abilities are no-where near Walter's, but likewise they should be talked about in unison. Edited March 10, 2015 by der Berliner 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.