Jump to content

 

 

Court of Session rules in favour of HMRC + Rangers Issue Statement


Recommended Posts

I see from the summary of the judgement that the learned judges have invoked a rarely used principal of the law of Scotland, namely the "common sense" rule.

 

It's been used quite a bit recently, including a case that I'm involved in. The problem (for me) is that the supreme court don't take the same attitude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The fly in the ointment being that MIH is being liquidated and I think it's fair to say Lloyds the main creditor won't fund any appeal which effectively means it would be up to OldCo (for all intents and purposes BDO) to fund any further action.

 

I can't see why Oldco/BDO would want to fund any action. BDO shouldn't care who the creditors are. It's just their job to make payouts to those identified, and HMRC are now included.

 

I can't see who is going to appeal this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see why Oldco/BDO would want to fund any action. BDO shouldn't care who the creditors are. It's just their job to make payouts to those identified, and HMRC are now included.

 

I can't see who is going to appeal this.

 

Good use of the RFFF?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.