Jump to content

 

 

Your choice of first team & subs


Recommended Posts

By the way, we can still sign freebies for some time.

 

Isn't it the case that players who have no team can be signed at any time? Thing is all things being equal an educated guess might be that if they were of a quality that could be useful to us they wouldn't be teamless at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't it the case that players who have no team can be signed at any time? Thing is all things being equal an educated guess might be that if they were of a quality that could be useful to us they wouldn't be teamless at all.

 

Not sure, methinks at least for a month after the window, but I haven't got any facts handy.

Edited by der Berliner
Link to post
Share on other sites

With regard to no keeper on bench it would be sods law as no doubt something would happen.I have always maintained that the position of goalkeeper should be able to be subbed at any time in the event of injury and this would be over and above subs allowed.

 

I seem to recall it used to be this way. 2 subs, then this got stretched to 2 subs plus a keeper. Eventually this got extended to 3 subs after teams started using the sub keeper in the last minutes to kill a bit of time. Might be wrong though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on what I've seen so far I'd go for:

 

Foderingham

 

Tav

Senderos

Wilson

Wallace

 

Rossiter

Forrester

Holt

 

Waghorn

Garner

McKay

 

 

I'd like to think Barton and Kranjcar will force their way into the team but they've not shown enough as it stands. Windass I'm also quite excited by and he may be the short-term dynamo we need in the enforced absence of Holt.

 

Brave not to include Joey and Niko but clearly Barton and Rossiter cannot play in the same team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brave not to include Joey and Niko but clearly Barton and Rossiter cannot play in the same team.

 

Barton and Kranjcar should be first choice but so far neither look like they have the legs to form two out of a three man midfield. Maybe if we had a stronger defence but not as it stands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.