the gunslinger 3,366 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 So someone applying for a job went to a meeting with a possible future boss. Im underwhelmed Must be missing something 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinstein 294 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 can't see that's got anything to do with the share buy out 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chilledbear 16 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 Was it Blair who was in for the job with the Club? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 This is concerning. First we had James Blair compromising his C1872 position by attending the Takeover Panel on behalf of the club and apparently putting forward the ridiculous suggestion that Dave King had no control over his shares, and now we have a second member further compromising C1872's independence for personal advancement. Both should resign and new elections take place. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 Was it Blair who was in for the job with the Club? I doubt he'd want the pay cut. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluedell 5,329 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 So someone applying for a job went to a meeting with a possible future boss. Im underwhelmed Must be missing something So what's the priority? keeping the future boss happy or the members that you're meant to be representing? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 I'd suggest the person in question should have resigned when they applied for the SLO role. But given James Blair's position I guess the line on that is somewhat blurry. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARGER 1,829 Posted March 18, 2017 Author Share Posted March 18, 2017 Craig Houston name in frame. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 (edited) Sad to about those very important club1872 resignations. But what has also worried me in that statement is what looks like a downgrading of club1872 importance with the board? Why other would they now make the Supporters Liaison Officer the new point of contact. club1872 is a major shareholder and the board is now in effect barred them from any direct contact with the board, that is imo untenable and club1872 should not accept this in any way, direct contact to the board or club1872 should withdraw any cooperation forthwith and protests made. Edited March 18, 2017 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie 8,151 Posted March 18, 2017 Share Posted March 18, 2017 Sad to about those very important club1872 resignations. But what has also worried me in that statement is what looks like a downgrading of club1872 importance with the board? Why other would they now make the Supporters Liaison Officer the new point of contact. club1872 is a major shareholder and the board is now in effect barred them from any direct contact with the board, that is imo untenable and club1872 should not accept this in any way, direct contact to the board or club1872 should withdraw any cooperation forthwith and protests made. Agree - just writing the same on social media. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.