Pedro Caixinha on why Michael O’Halloran WON’T be back at Ibrox

[compo 6,208]

There is only one man not fit to be at the club that's the coach

[Waltersgotstyle 297]

There is only one man not fit to be at the club that's the coach

 

I think a lot of people will be eating their words this season.

[Gaffer 1,665]

There is only one man not fit to be at the club that's the coach

 

You keep barking compo, but the caravan keeps on rolling.

[colinstein 294]

There is only one man not fit to be at the club that's the coach

 

you some sort of seagull following a trawler ?

[26th of foot 5,845]

Michael O'Halloran was the thread running through BBC Scotland's coverage today. The usual suspects achieved the following consensus :

 

1. Michael was NEVER given a real chance at Rangers. Now, it was Richard Gordon and fellow Dandy Dons that proposed this, the Jambo contingent agreed. Maybe, Kenny McLean and Jamie Walker being mentioned as Rangers targets has stimulated such a conclusion? I have sympathy with O'Halloran's plight, but is it true he has not been provided opportunity?

 

2. Tom English cannot fathom why Pedro made the statement, there is no advantage to the club. I agree with Tom's conclusion; although, a bit of much needed balance would have ensued if Tom had mentioned O'Halloran's indiscipline in failing to trap for an under 20s match. This particular fact has disappeared from BBC Scotland's collective memory.

 

3. Stuart Cosgrove thinks Pedro's statement was, "constructive dismissal"!

 

BBC Scotland hope to find a Rangers supporter soonest to lend some objectivity to debates. As soon as they find one good enough, he/she will be appointed.

[Gonzo79 13,735]

As soon as I see Tom English or Chris McLaughlin mentioned, I know exactly what agenda is being adhered to and thus ignore.

 

Pair of despicable, speccy, smug and embarrassing 'journalists'.

[Crimson Dynamo 128]

O'Hallaran didn't fit into either Caixhinas or Warburtons style of play. Its as simple as that. The only question I'd have is why did MW sign him, did he not know the type of player he was?

[Walterbear 557]

The only thing I need to know about MOH is that he contributed next to nothing every time he played for Rangers. What he does or doesn't do for other clubs is irrelevant to me.

 

Nail on head.

[Walterbear 557]

Michael O'Halloran was the thread running through BBC Scotland's coverage today. The usual suspects achieved the following consensus :

 

1. Michael was NEVER given a real chance at Rangers. Now, it was Richard Gordon and fellow Dandy Dons that proposed this, the Jambo contingent agreed. Maybe, Kenny McLean and Jamie Walker being mentioned as Rangers targets has stimulated such a conclusion? I have sympathy with O'Halloran's plight, but is it true he has not been provided opportunity?

 

2. Tom English cannot fathom why Pedro made the statement, there is no advantage to the club. I agree with Tom's conclusion; although, a bit of much needed balance would have ensued if Tom had mentioned O'Halloran's indiscipline in failing to trap for an under 20s match. This particular fact has disappeared from BBC Scotland's collective memory.

 

3. Stuart Cosgrove thinks Pedro's statement was, "constructive dismissal"!

 

BBC Scotland hope to find a Rangers supporter soonest to lend some objectivity to debates. As soon as they find one good enough, he/she will be appointed.

 

The statement in itself is not constructive dismissal. They (BBC) refuse to attend Ibrox because their reporter was biased and they sit on the sidelines constantly taking ignorant potshots. The arrogance is breathtaking.