Bill 13,717 Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Will doncaster now be sacked? Like any CEO or MD, Doncaster's role is to carry out the policies decided by the board. Much as I think he's a low-grade wage-thief, it might be prudent to focus on those sitting on the SPFL board rather than make Doncaster a very convenient and hugely overpaid scapegoat. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the gunslinger 3,366 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 But he went against his boards wishes here and persued his own anti rangers agenda. That's why he has to go. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 But he went against his boards wishes here and persued his own anti rangers agenda. That's why he has to go. Why do you think there is a statement from the SRFL board saying they wanted it and blaming the SFA? It is to savee Doncasters face. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Why do you think there is a statement from the SRFL board saying they wanted it and blaming the SFA? It is to savee Doncasters face. did they consult the 42 clubs ? NO Therefore Dumbcaster has to go 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aweebluesoandso 290 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) What a debacle by the SPFL of their own making, two contradictory and confusing statements being made within days of each other. There is a split and factions within the SPFL board, on one side, Doncaster and his paymaster Liewell, on the other side those who don't now toe the Liewell party line. As per usual we don't know what the club are doing to exploit this schism, is the club agitating for the removal of Doncaster. Why is the club not calling out publicly, the agenda by one club celtic. Clarification needs called for, did or do the SPFL board want a review of the Rangers EBT various and multiple punishments, one of which was illegal. Or did the SPFL only want an general review on procedures which did not specifically target Rangers again? Edited September 22, 2017 by aweebluesoandso 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete 2,499 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 did they consult the 42 clubs ? NO Therefore Dumbcaster has to go Does a boardroom always have to consult it's members? Did the members not vote them in to make decisions? I am not for Doncaster in any way but I will be shocked if he gets sacked for this. Sometimes it is also better a fool you know. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scotjo 19 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Tims on the articles online are now going on about a judicial review. Sad, lonely, obsessed bastards. Into a scheme that was legal? Good luck with that, maybe an inquiry into why there teams couldn't win it on the park? 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonzo79 13,623 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 The thought of a few hundred deluded, demented, obsessed and frankly, weird Tims flinging their spare cash at a judicial review is rather amusing. God knows, they've flung enough cash at obsessed bloggers over the years. One wonders how they can afford the annual trips to Santa Ponsa. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RANGERRAB 3,258 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Does a boardroom always have to consult it's members? Did the members not vote them in to make decisions? I am not for Doncaster in any way but I will be shocked if he gets sacked for this. Sometimes it is also better a fool you know. directors wouldn't last long in any boardroom if they disregarded the views of their members, shareholders etc. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
craig 5,198 Posted September 22, 2017 Share Posted September 22, 2017 Does a boardroom always have to consult it's members? Did the members not vote them in to make decisions? I am not for Doncaster in any way but I will be shocked if he gets sacked for this. Sometimes it is also better a fool you know. No, they don't. However, in this instance Doncaster's request for review specifically stated that the SPFL member clubs wished this review to take place. Given it was subsequently proven that not only did he not have unanimity amongst the clubs but it was actually a small minority who wished the review.... it shows that he was not being honest or transparent. Both of those traits should see him removed from his position. A CEO position is one of trust and if you cannot be trusted you should resign. 0 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.