Jump to content

 

 

Bookies suspend betting on Rangers being RELEGATED


Recommended Posts

A contribution to the debate on the power of internet paranoia.

https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/the-club’s-not-going-into-administration-rumours-of-administration-and-the-power-of-paranoia.15511/

The club’s not going into administration - Rumours of administration and the power of paranoia

The club’s not going into administration despite internet gossip and text messages.

The club’s debt free, investors have put in millions and between the club board, football board, senior management and the Three Bears we’ve got more chartered accountants involved in the oversight and ownership of the club than you can shake a stick at.

The latest wave of rumour has resulted in a couple of bookies suspending the market in Rangers going into admin - great publicity for the website that broke the story but it still doesn’t have the credibility of being in touch with reality.

You want the club to deny the story?  Well, they’ll have to issue statements every day of the week and provide the media with that old staple “the denial story” which can be used to justify any nonsense they choose to print - for instance, ‘Rangers today denied Dave King is an axe murderer.’ 

The current rumours are stoked by a text which claims that a director told his mate that not only was the club going into administration, but the date of administration, the points deduction, that the club would still stay in the league and that it was all being done to get rid of Dave King.  Really?

A director is going to give all that sort of info - and how could he know exactly how the governing bodies would react? - to a mate who helpfully puts it into a text that circulates around the internet?

More peculiarly the text just happens to be exactly like other texts and emails which have surfaced every couple of months since the good guys won control of the club back in March 2015.  Uncanny!

Apply common sense and caution.  If the board want rid of Dave King they just vote him out - he might be the biggest shareholder but he’s got nothing like a majority of shares.   People who have fought Green, the Easdales and Mike Ashley to a standstill and then victory are going to put it all at risk by going into voluntary administration?  

Have a look at the accounts - after all the woes the club has been through in the last five years they are as clean as a whistle.  If you extrapolate forward how much it will take to run the club in the next few years then it’s clearly manageable.

Leave the hysteria to Timothy and his allies

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BEARGER said:

A contribution to the debate on the power of internet paranoia.

https://www.followfollow.com/forum/threads/the-club’s-not-going-into-administration-rumours-of-administration-and-the-power-of-paranoia.15511/

The club’s not going into administration - Rumours of administration and the power of paranoia

The club’s not going into administration despite internet gossip and text messages.

The club’s debt free, investors have put in millions and between the club board, football board, senior management and the Three Bears we’ve got more chartered accountants involved in the oversight and ownership of the club than you can shake a stick at.

The latest wave of rumour has resulted in a couple of bookies suspending the market in Rangers going into admin - great publicity for the website that broke the story but it still doesn’t have the credibility of being in touch with reality.

You want the club to deny the story?  Well, they’ll have to issue statements every day of the week and provide the media with that old staple “the denial story” which can be used to justify any nonsense they choose to print - for instance, ‘Rangers today denied Dave King is an axe murderer.’ 

The current rumours are stoked by a text which claims that a director told his mate that not only was the club going into administration, but the date of administration, the points deduction, that the club would still stay in the league and that it was all being done to get rid of Dave King.  Really?

A director is going to give all that sort of info - and how could he know exactly how the governing bodies would react? - to a mate who helpfully puts it into a text that circulates around the internet?

More peculiarly the text just happens to be exactly like other texts and emails which have surfaced every couple of months since the good guys won control of the club back in March 2015.  Uncanny!

Apply common sense and caution.  If the board want rid of Dave King they just vote him out - he might be the biggest shareholder but he’s got nothing like a majority of shares.   People who have fought Green, the Easdales and Mike Ashley to a standstill and then victory are going to put it all at risk by going into voluntary administration?  

Have a look at the accounts - after all the woes the club has been through in the last five years they are as clean as a whistle.  If you extrapolate forward how much it will take to run the club in the next few years then it’s clearly manageable.

Leave the hysteria to Timothy and his allies

 

It is easy enough for fans to debunk but the damage has been done - reputationally we will have taken a hit even if there is zero truth in the story, so, as long as Rangers don’t take legal action, the perpetrators goal is complete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Redtops in social media (now includes all press outlets in Scotland) are all about looking for clickbait and anything to do with us will often be the busiest pages on their site. 

 

Yahoos will probably bypass stories on their own club and prioritise clicking on the latest Rangers news, with many leaving a trail of predictable comments . They aren't going to stop anytime soon and our board need to be concentrating on taking the club forward, not getting into a shouting match with that lot. Especially when our statements have a tendency of adding fuel to X or Y.

 

-------------

 

Our finances aren't healthy and there seems to be an impass of sorts wrt leadership and strategy that I had hoped would be sorted around the time of the AGM. This and the TOP/COS problem for Dave King provides a vacum of sorts that is being filled by the celtic-minded.

 

This probably all needs to be sorted before the club can say anything meaningful and informative.

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cooponthewing said:

 

My Avatar is Green Ffs! Seriously......? Can we change the colour Admin please? My eyes get sore as it is :)

Changing your own avatar would be better for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, cooponthewing said:

 

My Avatar is Green Ffs! Seriously......? Can we change the colour Admin please? My eyes get sore as it is :)

 

You can select your own avatar in your profile options (top right of screen).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oddschecker are trying to generate business.  The quotes from the sun story are from oddschecker spokesman George Elek, who also happens to be a journalist,.. so you can see where this one is going.

 

You take a load of incredibly thick and gullible punters , tell them something that they want to believe is true, and hey presto !.., job done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.